I like when authors ink them completely black

We can't exactly know for sure how other people feel pain or emotions or do the only look like they feel, so how can we be so sure to reject rights to a seemingly conscious robot. We don't know what sentience is in humans

I'm strongly against generative AI, but I always wondered if for example we made a robot body with all kinds of sensors to interact with a world on a similar level to humans. And it would start to act like it feels pain. How would we know if it's fake?

I'm so fucking ready

Damn, glad to see a new video, but don't overwork yourself (͡°_ʖ͡°)

Well, that was faster than I thought

Is that... Posting consistency? Please, give us more!!! I love your channel so much but there's nothing to watch тот

Well fair enough. But still it's very hard then for a company balance inspiration and plagiarism

Wasn't that decision made by just one artist working for a company? Should we still consider it as company stealing?

I just think that if you find a cool design and want to include it in your project, there's no way to be inspired by it without copying it's element. They should've asked first of course, but they don't seem to be intentionally stealing it for profit

;(

Well it's not one to one copy and they even told the artist that they were inspired by his work.
Megacorporations stealing from small artists is a problem, but I find this exact issue a very minor one

Would be nice of you to explain and not make me solve riddles

I would say no. I'm sorry, but I actually don't see how one copied design is a big issue. It's not a precedent either

Is it such a big deal? If somebody liked the design and copied it, but not one to one, is it that bad?

holy fucking creative freedom