Exactly!

and read her book.

press.umich.edu/Books/S/Seed...

Love this. I also need an escape.

Happy to see this journal on Bluesky!

Meanwhile, the ruling PPP keeps arguing that the arrest is illegal (it's a court order, so def legal/legitimate)🤦. Treating them as 'another voice' is dangerous. Bothsidesism nips at the heels of democracy.

I have to add that Yoon does this while instigating unrest by dog-whistling far-right wing activists--YouTubers, evangelical churches, and the notorious 'Taguekgi' troops. My colleague @immyungheelee.bsky.social wrote about who these people are: www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1...

In conclusion, Han's refusal to appoint the three nominees could cause significant instability in the country by delaying the Constitutional Court's judgment process on Yoon's impeachment case. fin/

The PPP's refusal to participate in these processes is unjustifiable and can only be interpreted as a deliberate attempt to obstruct Yoon's impeachment—a straightforward case in which the president declared martial law and disrupted the constitutional order. 5/n

Second, at least two out of the three nominees, whose hearing and voting process the ruling party (PPP) refused to participate in, were prearranged through a consensus between the opposition and the ruling party before December 3. 4/n

www.segye.com/newsView/202...

This is wrong for two reasons. First, the 3 justices appointed to the Constitutional Court are for the seats allocated to the legislature. Han's role in their appointment is a formality. (other 3 seats are assigned to the Supreme Court, and 3 to the president.) 3/n

imnews.imbc.com/replay/2024/...

Han refused to appoint three Constitutional Court justices, despite the risk of disrupting the formalization process of Yoon's impeachment. He claims that a bipartisan consensus is necessary for appointing the justices.2/n