The washington post is owned by billionaires and sucks now. But pretending that them going "here is what conservatives think (and here's why its wrong)" is arguing in favour of the conservatives is a stretch (2/2)
The washington post is owned by billionaires and sucks now. But pretending that them going "here is what conservatives think (and here's why its wrong)" is arguing in favour of the conservatives is a stretch (2/2)
They said a co-founder (who they point out left the year after the founding) and conservatives think that and then quotes the other co-founder simply explaining the flaws of their beliefs.
Then they show a conservative made "unbiased" (1/2)
They said a co-founder (who they point out left the year after the founding) and conservatives think that and then quotes the other co-founder simply explaining the flaws of their beliefs.
Then they show a conservative made "unbiased" (1/2)