Look at it this way–maybe you were keeping McKinsey from juicing up another OxyContin-type situation.

My same comment. I thought they’d show “the place” everyone argues is the best…but no.

Yeah, she’s sounds like she’s in a dark, confused place. Hopefully she figures it out.

Ok so you don’t know and are playing petty. Got it. Found your Goodreads and I think it’s best if I let you go try to be an author…or whatever…because…ouch. Bye!

What the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact was then? Signed August 24, 1939. I’ve dropped nothing but facts. You’ve dropped nothing but personal attacks and name calling. So who needs education?

But…he did. Stalin invaded Poland, threatened the Baltics, invaded Finland (and the Soviets were booted from League of Nations), then occupied Latvia, Estonia, Lithuania and parts of Romania. This was all because Hitler wasn’t in conflict with Stalin. And this isn’t butchering Europe to you?

Pseudo history…right. So according to your history, why did Stalin not enter the war for the first two years? What was the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact then?

What’s more, what’s there to misunderstand about a non-aggression pact? Its name says what it is. It was a promise between Hitler and Stalin not to engage in conflict so they could both butcher up the rest of Europe. So again, why are you so strangely defensive about Stalin?

I was pretty factual and cited well documented history. It’s interesting that instead of providing a rebuttal that tried you name called. And it’s pretty weird that you’re out to defend…Stalin? Of all people to put your energy into…Stalin? Maybe a hobby would help.

For the first full two years of the war Stalin was in a non-aggression pact with Hitler. Stalin took the opportunity to threaten and invade Eastern Europe. After unsuccessful negotiations for Stalin to join the Axis, Hitler finally invaded the USSR. Stalin was not an anti-fascist/Nazi by any stretch