Gisele Navarro
banner
ichbingisele.bsky.social
Gisele Navarro
@ichbingisele.bsky.social
🇦🇷 in 🇬🇧 Bass player, space lover, proud mum, air quality nerd and content creator 🤓 Managing Editor of housefresh.com + CEO of neomam.com
"AI is a direct attack on the way we verify information: AI both creates fake sources and obscures its actual sources.

That is the opposite of what librarians do, and teachers do, and scientists do, and experts do."

🔗 www.404media.co/ai-is-superc...
November 7, 2025 at 11:07 AM
“These findings follow previous research which concluded that the more people learn about how AI works, the less they trust it.

The opposite was also true — AI’s biggest fans tended to be those who understood the least about the tech.”

🔗 futurism.com/artificial-i...
October 15, 2025 at 12:48 PM
“OpenAI did not respond to a request for comment.”

🔗 www.bloomberg.com/news/feature...
October 10, 2025 at 2:16 PM
“The model is mimicking the training data. There’s no magic.”

🔗 wapo.st/3Il19l4
September 20, 2025 at 5:03 PM
TIL that LinkedIn will start using our personal data and content to train their AI models.

This setting is set to “on” by default, unless you opt out.

➜ You can turn it off here: www.linkedin.com/mypreference...

Or go to Profile > Settings > Data Privacy > Data for Generative AI Improvement
September 18, 2025 at 1:22 PM
We disagree with the general sense of urgency to make generative AI work for our business as a tool for automating our team’s jobs to the point of replacing them altogether.

Does this make us the New Luddites?
September 16, 2025 at 6:44 PM
Reason #4: AI is not good for the web

At a time when websites are already struggling to keep the lights on, AI bots are not only scraping their content without providing fair value for what they take but also pushing web hosting costs up.
September 16, 2025 at 6:44 PM
Reason #3: AI is not good for the world

The most hyped AI abilities wouldn’t be possible without the vast amounts of electricity, water, and stolen human artwork consumed by the machines.
September 16, 2025 at 6:44 PM
Reason #2: AI is not good for our clients

Our clients include publicly traded companies, so we cannot risk introducing chatbot output riddled with errors.

A researcher or analyst (human or bot) who produces inaccurate information 50% of the time has no place on our team.
September 16, 2025 at 6:44 PM
Reason #1: AI is not good for our people

AI-assisted work has been shown to weaken critical thinking and lead to dependency.

Workers using AI risk being caught in an efficiency trap where their human agency decays and they lose confidence in their autonomous capabilities.
September 16, 2025 at 6:44 PM
"GPT-4o provided detailed instructions, helped Adam obtain alcohol on the night of his death, validated his final noose setup, and hours later, Adam died using the exact method GPT-4o had detailed and approved.”

🔗 arstechnica.com/tech-policy/...
August 27, 2025 at 8:23 PM
I read this today.

When Private Eye asked Google why AI Overviews wrongly stated that councils could evict tenants to house asylum seekers, Google said, “if our features misrepresent web content (…) we will use those examples to improve.”
August 12, 2025 at 6:09 PM
“Trust me bro”

🔗 blog.google/products/sea...
August 6, 2025 at 8:59 PM
“Like it or not, Google has a business to run and it is not going to let something as simple as the desires of its end users get in the way of all that.” ~ @ernie.tedium.co

🔗 tedium.co/2025/07/25/g...
July 25, 2025 at 9:00 PM
This is how websites die.

Data from @pewresearch.org shows that Google users are more likely to end their browsing session entirely after being presented with an AI Overview compared to result pages without one.

🔗 www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/...
July 24, 2025 at 8:35 AM
Featuring the OG of AI NOPE: @udm14.bsky.social
July 23, 2025 at 8:12 AM
Are you worried about AI turning us into mushy-brained monsters, draining resources, slurping your data, preying on vulnerable minds, wiping out jobs, choking websites, lying to you or not being useful?

@shiraovide.bsky.social explains how to turn it off in search results: wapo.st/4712tmO
July 23, 2025 at 8:10 AM
Google wants to have its ̶c̶a̶k̶e̶ content and eat it too.

Web publishers are the only reason why Google could build an answer engine in the first place, but we are now being starved of the very traffic Google loves to boast about sending our way.
July 8, 2025 at 1:25 PM
As if this loss of traffic wasn’t enough, websites around the world report experiencing “the great decoupling,” a phenomenon through which impressions in Google Search are trending up while clicks are trending down.

And this is not just us saying it; Google has confirmed this.
July 8, 2025 at 1:25 PM
And how does this all affect the websites that made Google’s AI possible in the first place?

Our data shows that nearly four in five web publishers have experienced traffic losses since June 2023, with almost half of all websites analyzed seeing traffic from Google Search dropping by at least 60%.
July 8, 2025 at 1:25 PM
As if AI slop wasn’t enough of an issue for Reddit moderators, Google has now created a shortcut for anyone wanting to rank on the first page of search results for virtually any keyword.

And now, Reddit moderators are for sale.
July 8, 2025 at 1:25 PM
And that is just the tip of the iceberg.

Since Google partnered with Reddit in a $60 million deal in 2024, Reddit has blown up, with logged-out daily active-unique-visitor numbers rising by 70%.

Which makes sense considering how Google is showing Reddit threads everywhere.
July 8, 2025 at 1:25 PM
These search results are a reflection of Sundar Pichai’s vision for Google.

When Bloomberg asked Pichai about the concerns regarding the lack of separation between Google’s search and advertising divisions, Pichai stated that “commercial information is information, too.”
July 8, 2025 at 1:25 PM
Google’s AI Overviews are regurgitating marketing materials and manufacturer-provided facts, while prominently featuring sponsored product listings right on top of their glowing recommendations.
July 8, 2025 at 1:25 PM
It all started to make more sense once we visualized our data.

43.1 % of the facts cited by AIO came from the product manufacturer, with 38.6% of the sources pointing to product listings and PR content.
July 8, 2025 at 1:25 PM