Yes! I didnt know, but it seems to be the pattern!

I never complained about the article. Thats your assumption. I wrote information that I considered important for context upfront. Either if I had to look it for myself or if anyone chooses to subscribe and read it in the article is neither your choice nor your business. Stop agroing.

I choose to go to the original video first instead of subscribing and reading it there so, yes: Pertinent information behind a deliberate clickbait.

I did not know about that

You need to subscribe to read it.

Not on the public part of the article.

If you read the top coment on the video. Ben adresses that the ad has been removed and the money refunded. Ben is good the other shitters are trash.