Ian Fisch (KingmakersGamedev)
@ianfisch.bsky.social
Videogame Developer (C++, Unreal Engine, Unity). Former Sega. Making Kingmakers videogame with tinyBuild. Also made Road Redemption.
https://store.steampowered.com/app/2109770/Kingmakers/
https://store.steampowered.com/app/2109770/Kingmakers/
So how do you define “male sex”?
November 13, 2025 at 2:19 AM
So how do you define “male sex”?
Ok so what’s your definition?
November 13, 2025 at 2:15 AM
Ok so what’s your definition?
So what’s your definition?
November 13, 2025 at 1:44 AM
So what’s your definition?
I gave you a definition, as you asked. You may think it’s incorrect, but it’s still an answer.
So now it’s your turn.
So now it’s your turn.
November 13, 2025 at 1:40 AM
I gave you a definition, as you asked. You may think it’s incorrect, but it’s still an answer.
So now it’s your turn.
So now it’s your turn.
I answered your question. Now it’s your turn.
November 13, 2025 at 1:37 AM
I answered your question. Now it’s your turn.
No you’re just trying to endlessly pick my definition apart, because you’re too much of a coward to give me yours.
November 13, 2025 at 1:36 AM
No you’re just trying to endlessly pick my definition apart, because you’re too much of a coward to give me yours.
So does male sex exist or not?
November 13, 2025 at 1:34 AM
So does male sex exist or not?
We need nuclear power, immediately.
November 13, 2025 at 1:31 AM
We need nuclear power, immediately.
Ok so what’s your definition?
November 13, 2025 at 1:30 AM
Ok so what’s your definition?
Ok so what’s your definition?
November 13, 2025 at 1:30 AM
Ok so what’s your definition?
Ok well then what’s your definition?
November 13, 2025 at 12:32 AM
Ok well then what’s your definition?
I would say that anyone with a Y chromosome is of male sex.
Perhaps you could exclude those with androgen insensitivity.
Is that a good definition for you?
Perhaps you could exclude those with androgen insensitivity.
Is that a good definition for you?
November 13, 2025 at 12:22 AM
I would say that anyone with a Y chromosome is of male sex.
Perhaps you could exclude those with androgen insensitivity.
Is that a good definition for you?
Perhaps you could exclude those with androgen insensitivity.
Is that a good definition for you?
I’ll vote for him if he gets the nomination. Or would you prefer president Vance?
November 13, 2025 at 12:16 AM
I’ll vote for him if he gets the nomination. Or would you prefer president Vance?
If Bill Clinton hadn’t won, we wouldn’t have Obergefell. Think about that.
November 13, 2025 at 12:16 AM
If Bill Clinton hadn’t won, we wouldn’t have Obergefell. Think about that.
No matter what I say, you’ll just keep doing this.
I’ll say “sex is defined by chromosomes” and you’ll say “but what is a chromosome? Prove to me that chromosomes exist!” And so on.
I’ll say “sex is defined by chromosomes” and you’ll say “but what is a chromosome? Prove to me that chromosomes exist!” And so on.
November 13, 2025 at 12:13 AM
No matter what I say, you’ll just keep doing this.
I’ll say “sex is defined by chromosomes” and you’ll say “but what is a chromosome? Prove to me that chromosomes exist!” And so on.
I’ll say “sex is defined by chromosomes” and you’ll say “but what is a chromosome? Prove to me that chromosomes exist!” And so on.
Considering you call someone a bigot for having a slightly different definition of cisgender, yes that does not help.
You don’t win elections that way. Over half the country is out-and-proud transphobic, so you’re just gonna have to allow it, unless you want another Brett Kavanaugh on the bench.
You don’t win elections that way. Over half the country is out-and-proud transphobic, so you’re just gonna have to allow it, unless you want another Brett Kavanaugh on the bench.
November 13, 2025 at 12:11 AM
Considering you call someone a bigot for having a slightly different definition of cisgender, yes that does not help.
You don’t win elections that way. Over half the country is out-and-proud transphobic, so you’re just gonna have to allow it, unless you want another Brett Kavanaugh on the bench.
You don’t win elections that way. Over half the country is out-and-proud transphobic, so you’re just gonna have to allow it, unless you want another Brett Kavanaugh on the bench.
Unlike you, I don’t stalk people’s profiles on here.
I assumed you were American since you express such strong opinions on our political parties.
I assumed you were American since you express such strong opinions on our political parties.
November 13, 2025 at 12:06 AM
Unlike you, I don’t stalk people’s profiles on here.
I assumed you were American since you express such strong opinions on our political parties.
I assumed you were American since you express such strong opinions on our political parties.
Dems are the ones who removed the SAT requirements for college admissions.
Yes they’re not perfect, but I vote for them anyway.
Yes they’re not perfect, but I vote for them anyway.
November 13, 2025 at 12:05 AM
Dems are the ones who removed the SAT requirements for college admissions.
Yes they’re not perfect, but I vote for them anyway.
Yes they’re not perfect, but I vote for them anyway.
Anyone who strongly supports LGBT rights and didn’t vote for Kamala is simply an idiot. I don’t know what else to tell you.
November 13, 2025 at 12:04 AM
Anyone who strongly supports LGBT rights and didn’t vote for Kamala is simply an idiot. I don’t know what else to tell you.
I don’t believe I’ve done any of that. However purity test anti-coalition builders aren’t helping.
November 13, 2025 at 12:02 AM
I don’t believe I’ve done any of that. However purity test anti-coalition builders aren’t helping.
At least I vote. I’d say a bigger reason for them losing is people like you not bothering to vote.
November 12, 2025 at 11:56 PM
At least I vote. I’d say a bigger reason for them losing is people like you not bothering to vote.
Eh I’m not impressed, but if people like them and pay you for them, then I’m happy for you.
November 12, 2025 at 11:43 PM
Eh I’m not impressed, but if people like them and pay you for them, then I’m happy for you.
You have more followers on this moribund platform, maybe.
Where’s a link to your cutting boards website, so I can find reasons to criticize them?
Where’s a link to your cutting boards website, so I can find reasons to criticize them?
November 12, 2025 at 11:24 PM
You have more followers on this moribund platform, maybe.
Where’s a link to your cutting boards website, so I can find reasons to criticize them?
Where’s a link to your cutting boards website, so I can find reasons to criticize them?
Do people actually want more people to go to jail for THC? How ridiculous.
November 12, 2025 at 11:15 PM
Do people actually want more people to go to jail for THC? How ridiculous.
Ok. What have you done with your life, that’s irrelevant to this discussion, that I can criticize?
November 12, 2025 at 11:11 PM
Ok. What have you done with your life, that’s irrelevant to this discussion, that I can criticize?