...are you aware that the laws only protect people with power? and are only enforced against people that ruling structures want to get rid of? the dynamics that subjugate women in court are the same ones that keep the state operating. have you heard of systemic racism before?

the fact that the law has not stopped these people is reason alone not to focus on it. are you serious? do u always reach first for the tool that has most consistently failed you

this is the US's new business model by the way! BRICS is dismantling the oil dollar, and this is how the US economy can remain relevant

do you not see how loaded with cognitive dissonance this is? why are you excusing the sexist structures that ruined her life, and why are you doing that in the name of giving bill clinton (an epstein client) a pass

it's so crazy to bring up laws when the law has historically debased and humiliated targets of sexual violence but you do you. good luck with moving through the world while evaluating your relationships based on whether behavior is legal or not. im sure itll go great

i saw the same thing and felt the same way. the kids are simply using 100+ tracks as a matter of course

"can use guys believe it? these stupid idiots got away again of course! like they always do! pathetic idiots"

the technological layer of nation building is one of the first and most salient structures we have to build against. understanding that layer in the 21st century is both opening the door and making sure it doesnt lock behind us

obama did this too in syria hope this helps

the role of politics is central to this particular discussion?

listen to that feeling

they are obviously worse! duh! obviously! that said, the takeaway is: none of these people are suited for governance. they are all sick and need to be taken out of the power equation. the dems wont move on the epstein list because they are also implicated. sickening to split hairs for politics on SA

letting the DNC off the hook for enabling sexual assault is part of how we got here? are u serious?

youre kind of proving my point

and i appreciate you splitting hairs

this isnt a particularly significant point imo. not sure why its necessary for any pther purpose than to continue the DNC talking point of "we're bad but theyre worse" and if were using SA as a vector for that conversation we already lost the plot

if you think thats high quality consent youre having an out of date discussion about sexual safety. the dems dont get a pass. no accusations is not proof of this either. you gain nothing protecting a pedophile affiliated oligarch who doesnt care about you

that song is truly incredible tho! firmly in the overrated camp, myself