🇮🇹🇬🇧🇩🇪🇦🇹🇨🇭🇪🇸🇫🇷🍕🇻🇦LOQVOR
ELO
🇮🇹1 Sinner
🇪🇸2 Alcaraz
🇷🇸3 Djokovic
🇩🇪4 Zverev
🇺🇸5 Fritz
ATP
🇪🇸1 Alcaraz
🇮🇹2 Sinner
🇩🇪3 Zverev
🇷🇸4 Djokovic
🇨🇦5 Auger Aliassime
age 16
🇦🇺Hewitt
🇺🇦Bilozertsev
🇫🇷Kouame
age 17
🇩🇪Dedura
🇮🇳Dhmane
🇮🇹Vasamì
age 18
🇩🇪Engl
🇮🇹Cinà
🇺🇸Blanch
age19
🇧🇷Fonseca
🇺🇸Tien
🇪🇸Landaluce
age20
🇨🇿Mensik
🇧🇪Blockx
🇭🇷Prizmic
ELO
🇮🇹1 Sinner
🇪🇸2 Alcaraz
🇷🇸3 Djokovic
🇩🇪4 Zverev
🇺🇸5 Fritz
ATP
🇪🇸1 Alcaraz
🇮🇹2 Sinner
🇩🇪3 Zverev
🇷🇸4 Djokovic
🇨🇦5 Auger Aliassime
age 16
🇦🇺Hewitt
🇺🇦Bilozertsev
🇫🇷Kouame
age 17
🇩🇪Dedura
🇮🇳Dhmane
🇮🇹Vasamì
age 18
🇩🇪Engl
🇮🇹Cinà
🇺🇸Blanch
age19
🇧🇷Fonseca
🇺🇸Tien
🇪🇸Landaluce
age20
🇨🇿Mensik
🇧🇪Blockx
🇭🇷Prizmic
Siamo in finale di Coppa Davis per il terzo anno consecutivo.
Cosa cazzo hai fatto Flavio Cobolli? ♥️
Siamo in finale di Coppa Davis per il terzo anno consecutivo.
Cosa cazzo hai fatto Flavio Cobolli? ♥️
Don't let the title fool you, we went way beyond just talking about the #ATPFinals 🎾✔️🎾
open.spotify.com/episode/1ENy...
Don't let the title fool you, we went way beyond just talking about the #ATPFinals 🎾✔️🎾
open.spotify.com/episode/1ENy...
Until the move from December to January & change from grass to Rod Laver arena, the Australian Open was by no means on the same level as RG, Wimbledon and US Open. The fourth tournament for the first half of the open era was actually Rome, until the AO made the crucial investments in the eighties
Until the move from December to January & change from grass to Rod Laver arena, the Australian Open was by no means on the same level as RG, Wimbledon and US Open. The fourth tournament for the first half of the open era was actually Rome, until the AO made the crucial investments in the eighties
that's to say, in theory raising to slam level can be achieved. Miami/Key-Biscayne held a similar spot in the 80ies. The candidates to do this now are Indian Wells, Rome, China and Saudi. So those 4 tournaments would have to distribute 2k points with 128 draw to form a F1 like tour with the slams
that's to say, in theory raising to slam level can be achieved. Miami/Key-Biscayne held a similar spot in the 80ies. The candidates to do this now are Indian Wells, Rome, China and Saudi. So those 4 tournaments would have to distribute 2k points with 128 draw to form a F1 like tour with the slams
the 250 tournaments would still be around, but they would look more like 125 challengers. Meaning that the top 5, 10 or 15 players would only play the 8 "slam like tournaments" (4 under ATP control) plus the YearEnd Masters, Monte Carlo and the occasional 500, so about 10 to 12 tournaments a year
the 250 tournaments would still be around, but they would look more like 125 challengers. Meaning that the top 5, 10 or 15 players would only play the 8 "slam like tournaments" (4 under ATP control) plus the YearEnd Masters, Monte Carlo and the occasional 500, so about 10 to 12 tournaments a year
this would have to be built into the ranking system, meaning that players of a certain status (say above top50 for instance) would get a "zero" if missing one of the "4 combined ATP/WTA slams" AO, RG, Wimby, USO or the YEM YearEndMasters. Only something like 14 results would count for the ranking
this would have to be built into the ranking system, meaning that players of a certain status (say above top50 for instance) would get a "zero" if missing one of the "4 combined ATP/WTA slams" AO, RG, Wimby, USO or the YEM YearEndMasters. Only something like 14 results would count for the ranking
Such calendar would also allow solving DavisCup situation, if ATP/WTA & ITF can find deal.
DavisCup&BJK finals could take the Olympics slot between Wimbledon & US Open on odd years, so every 2 years.
On even years there would be Olympic tennis.
On Winter Olympics years a mixed LaverCup like thing
Such calendar would also allow solving DavisCup situation, if ATP/WTA & ITF can find deal.
DavisCup&BJK finals could take the Olympics slot between Wimbledon & US Open on odd years, so every 2 years.
On even years there would be Olympic tennis.
On Winter Olympics years a mixed LaverCup like thing
YEM Year End Masters would then effectively end season, the best for YEM would be to play only singles on court without tramlines, like at MadisonSquareGarden or NextGen.
Instead of the 2 daily doubles matches there would be 4 groups of 4 players.
So 4 singles matches each day
Then 1/4
semi
final
YEM Year End Masters would then effectively end season, the best for YEM would be to play only singles on court without tramlines, like at MadisonSquareGarden or NextGen.
Instead of the 2 daily doubles matches there would be 4 groups of 4 players.
So 4 singles matches each day
Then 1/4
semi
final
a YEM with 16 players would also solve the problem that the most in-form players often can't compete, like Nalbandian the year he beat up on the FabFour in Madrid and Paris and could not play the WTF.
Also injuries in the group stage would be less of a factor
a YEM with 16 players would also solve the problem that the most in-form players often can't compete, like Nalbandian the year he beat up on the FabFour in Madrid and Paris and could not play the WTF.
Also injuries in the group stage would be less of a factor
the "mixed LaverCup like thing" to be held between Wimbledon & US Open, in the years of the Winter Olympics, could be with 2 groups of 3 teams:
Europe
America
Africa
India (plus neighbours in Western-Asia)
East-Asia (basically China+NKR)
Oceania (tweaked: basically AUS+NZ+JAP+SKR+Indonesia etc.)
the "mixed LaverCup like thing" to be held between Wimbledon & US Open, in the years of the Winter Olympics, could be with 2 groups of 3 teams:
Europe
America
Africa
India (plus neighbours in Western-Asia)
East-Asia (basically China+NKR)
Oceania (tweaked: basically AUS+NZ+JAP+SKR+Indonesia etc.)
before the YEM YearEndMasters there would be a week with only ITF futures & after YEM about 6 weeks of only challengers
Then on week 51 NextGenFinals
on week 52 DoublesMasters played on a court without singles sidelines.
It would start the season & feature the best 8 teams of the year, plus mixed
before the YEM YearEndMasters there would be a week with only ITF futures & after YEM about 6 weeks of only challengers
Then on week 51 NextGenFinals
on week 52 DoublesMasters played on a court without singles sidelines.
It would start the season & feature the best 8 teams of the year, plus mixed
it would look something like this
week
51 NextGen
52 Doubles Masters
1 Auckland etc.
2 AO quali +Adelaide etc.
3 AO
4 AO
5 250 (plus DAVIS CUP BJK quali&play-off on odd years)
6 Rotterdam etc.
7 Doha etc.
8 Indian Wells quali +Acapulco, Miami 500
9 Indian Wells
10 IW
11 Huston, Marrakech etc.
it would look something like this
week
51 NextGen
52 Doubles Masters
1 Auckland etc.
2 AO quali +Adelaide etc.
3 AO
4 AO
5 250 (plus DAVIS CUP BJK quali&play-off on odd years)
6 Rotterdam etc.
7 Doha etc.
8 Indian Wells quali +Acapulco, Miami 500
9 Indian Wells
10 IW
11 Huston, Marrakech etc.
12 Monte Carlo 1000
13 Barcelona etc.
14 ROME quali +Munich, Madrid 500
15 ROME
16 ROME +125 challenger
17 Geneva etc.
18 ROLANG GARROS quali +Hamburg
19 RG
20 RG
21 Stuttgart etc.
22 Queen's, Halle
23 WIMBLEDON quali +Eastbourne
24 WIMBY
25 WIMBY
26 Gstaad, Båstad etc.
27 Kitzbühel, Toronto
12 Monte Carlo 1000
13 Barcelona etc.
14 ROME quali +Munich, Madrid 500
15 ROME
16 ROME +125 challenger
17 Geneva etc.
18 ROLANG GARROS quali +Hamburg
19 RG
20 RG
21 Stuttgart etc.
22 Queen's, Halle
23 WIMBLEDON quali +Eastbourne
24 WIMBY
25 WIMBY
26 Gstaad, Båstad etc.
27 Kitzbühel, Toronto
28 OLYMPICS, on odd years DavisCup&BJK finals every 2 years, on years of Winter Olympics a mixed LaverCup like thing
29 Montreal, Washington
30 Cincinnati
31 US OPEN quali +Salem
32 US OPEN
33 USO
34 Tokyo
35 Shanghai
36 CHINA OPEN quali
37 CHINA OPEN
38 CHINA OPEN
39 Stockholm etc.
28 OLYMPICS, on odd years DavisCup&BJK finals every 2 years, on years of Winter Olympics a mixed LaverCup like thing
29 Montreal, Washington
30 Cincinnati
31 US OPEN quali +Salem
32 US OPEN
33 USO
34 Tokyo
35 Shanghai
36 CHINA OPEN quali
37 CHINA OPEN
38 CHINA OPEN
39 Stockholm etc.