Point taken, but I worry that you've conflated "not crap" with "great." Perhaps a more granular sector graph would allow us to look for the 0<x<10% that's great.

I would also highly recommend Veronica Sidhu's "Menus and Memories from Punjab," if you enjoy northern cuisine. Solid home cooking recipes, in a somewhat random order.

That's what my classroom has been missing: a penalty box!

Have read Agarwal et al. 2008 & 2011.

I feel like back on Twitter it was easier to follow tags, which made finding new content (and opening up discussions) more organic and frequent.

Uncanny. I'm not convinced you don't work at my school.

Also didn't bother with mastodon or threads. This seemed like the best alternative. Honestly, it doesn't (yet?) have the buzz and critical mass of people, but I can't stomach going back until it gets sold to a new owner. So here I am.

Rings true. Please tell me we've got solutions coming part 2.

Also very curious about this. Have been thinking about this recently.

As an aside, do your students take any notes in books for reference, get given notes, or just rely on MWB work to stay on top of old content?

Most of what I've read seems to imply that interleaving would be practicing multiple related concepts in a mixed up order with the goal of enhancing method discrimination.

I know what you mean, but I think perhaps it's an implementation of the spacing effect. Either way, I'm a fan.

Agreed. I ended up not putting any up.

Just to clarify (for my sleep-deprived teacher brain), the curve itself is not so useful, but semi-regular spaced retrieval practice still generally recommended?

Yes, because the only options are UK and US. 😢🇦🇺🦘

spicy chart of the week

Vidunderlig!

will keep an eye out next time.

ooh. What is/was Bluesky Maths Hub?