Birdman
@hoedy.bsky.social
I live by the three Bs: birds, basketball, and being too online
Showed up to plymouth argyle practice drunk more than once (allegedly)
August 2, 2025 at 7:33 PM
Showed up to plymouth argyle practice drunk more than once (allegedly)
They are for children. And parents of them desperate for things to do with them. We are many, and pretty undiscerning.
July 7, 2025 at 12:06 AM
They are for children. And parents of them desperate for things to do with them. We are many, and pretty undiscerning.
Billy you'd also be taxing everyone else. If you did what you're saying you'd be able to easily provide universal health care. I think most people would like to go see the doctor more than they'd like to have their diapers delivered to their house by Tuesday.
June 30, 2025 at 2:44 AM
Billy you'd also be taxing everyone else. If you did what you're saying you'd be able to easily provide universal health care. I think most people would like to go see the doctor more than they'd like to have their diapers delivered to their house by Tuesday.
I think the Magic were a lot closer to the Pacers/Knicks tier when healthy last year than people realize. Paolo, Franz and Suggs played 6 games and 97 total minutes together last year. Just them having a fully healthy season likely puts them up close to 50 wins. Adding Bane? They'll be in the mix.
June 15, 2025 at 6:01 PM
I think the Magic were a lot closer to the Pacers/Knicks tier when healthy last year than people realize. Paolo, Franz and Suggs played 6 games and 97 total minutes together last year. Just them having a fully healthy season likely puts them up close to 50 wins. Adding Bane? They'll be in the mix.
I think it's less about having a true PG and more about cobbling together enough total playmaking across your lineup. Suggs, Franz, Paolo, and Bane are all B- to B+ playmakers. I think it works.
June 15, 2025 at 5:52 PM
I think it's less about having a true PG and more about cobbling together enough total playmaking across your lineup. Suggs, Franz, Paolo, and Bane are all B- to B+ playmakers. I think it works.
very embarrassing thing for you to post, senator, thank you
June 13, 2025 at 6:54 PM
very embarrassing thing for you to post, senator, thank you
It's the top 3, then a gap. I think you could honestly make a case for any of the top 3 at #1 after the seasons they each just had.
May 28, 2025 at 8:37 PM
It's the top 3, then a gap. I think you could honestly make a case for any of the top 3 at #1 after the seasons they each just had.
She's just moltin! She'll be a knockout again soon enough.
May 16, 2025 at 3:26 PM
She's just moltin! She'll be a knockout again soon enough.
julie it might be time for your nap
May 14, 2025 at 2:58 PM
julie it might be time for your nap
Literally nothing. Sometimes 2% chances happen and it's cool when they do.
May 8, 2025 at 2:47 AM
Literally nothing. Sometimes 2% chances happen and it's cool when they do.
That's fair. Hard to see fouling immediately in the back court with that much time left being compatible with any choice. You really can only decrease win probability sending them to the line from there.
May 6, 2025 at 1:52 PM
That's fair. Hard to see fouling immediately in the back court with that much time left being compatible with any choice. You really can only decrease win probability sending them to the line from there.
This dunk should've sealed the game! Jokic is out of the game, the best defense in the league is set, Denver has no timeouts. Worst case scenario is a pretty desperate Denver shot to tie after going the length of the court... unless you bail them out by fouling immediately.
May 6, 2025 at 1:46 PM
This dunk should've sealed the game! Jokic is out of the game, the best defense in the league is set, Denver has no timeouts. Worst case scenario is a pretty desperate Denver shot to tie after going the length of the court... unless you bail them out by fouling immediately.
Didn’t Biden beat Trump? What evidence do you have that it had no impact?
April 27, 2025 at 8:37 PM
Didn’t Biden beat Trump? What evidence do you have that it had no impact?
You’re not going after newsmax viewers. You’re trying to get the vast majority of Americans who disagree with Trump excited about supporting the party that opposes him. Impeachment is a no-brainer political win.
April 27, 2025 at 8:04 PM
You’re not going after newsmax viewers. You’re trying to get the vast majority of Americans who disagree with Trump excited about supporting the party that opposes him. Impeachment is a no-brainer political win.
Sending the collaborationists packing within the confines of the existing political structure is prob the most efficient path, of the many suboptimal but realistic outcomes.
April 27, 2025 at 3:03 PM
Sending the collaborationists packing within the confines of the existing political structure is prob the most efficient path, of the many suboptimal but realistic outcomes.