Assume that I need to move my factory to the US due to new tariffs. I doubt that I can export the product to other countries again by higher labor costs. Then the best option for the company: we may just produce simpler, basic products in the US for the US market. Oh wait.... ? sounds familiar.

AI can send an email, call. take a note, and sort of thinking.

Then we can replace a CEO? oh wait maybe too dangerous?

But the worst case we can unplug it.

Now that AI tries to perform some browser actions, assuming that it's good and everyone is going to love this, eventually no one will search web by themselves, then why do we need to build nice web or mobile sites? We can just return text or data instead, now we can go back to terminal only era.

Everyone said that content from AI is bad.
Everyone thinks AI will replace a certain job function.
Everyone claimed their company is doing AI.

What is the logic here?

So will we replace certain job functions using AI to generate something which eventually everyone will hate?

Bluesky really reminds me of old days Twitter. haha.

One of the worst CEOs I've met hired an employee and within 30 days announced a pay cut due to funding delays.
I still wonder, if I were a CEO, would I even think about hiring someone if I didn't have enough cash for at least 12 months?

Everyone has a calculator, even in their phone now, and it's much better at calculations than most humans. But no one suggests we should stop learning math. Now, people argue we shouldn't learn coding because AI will replace it. Following this logic, why do we need schools or education at all?