Thanks for your interest and suggestion! It is possible we include a code in the updated version of the preprint and/or the final, published paper.

Also, looking forward to hearing any feedback if you read it - trying to make it ready for peer review. It's a rather theoretical model, cutting some corners, so I'm curious how it's received amongst exercise physiologists.

Yes, I think their system has a strong rationale and deserves to be put under scientific scrutiny! More (experimental) studies to come in the future, I hope 🤞

We suggest that quantifying load using 3 dimensions rather than one better predicts adaptations specifically in CP, W', and Pmax. Using a global amalgamation of load such as total work, TRIMP, or TSS inevitably leads to more uncertainty about what exact attributes training is targeting.

Accumulating work at different intensities relative to CP, Pmax, and remaining W' results in somewhat distinct adaptive responses, which should be taken into account when trying to model training and predict performance gains.