Even if that was true, the amount of lives saved is just so many orders of magnitude more. Plus, with the amount of vaccins given I expect more people died from crossing the street on their way to get the vaccin then the 10 supposed deaths caused by the vaccin itself. Again, if it was true

I once tried to buy just the "new" modifier to attach to an existing object, but it turns out they decay even faster on their own into just object then a regular "new object" :c

Do you have the poison that makes you pale and cough blood at dramatic moments? Preferably the one that means you have to move to a mansion on the hills near the see to recover, where the locals never see any signs of life except for butler who has to do grocery shopping in the quaint little town

Ah yes, the autism bike. We all know it

Heh, foolish cartoonist. I'm just using you for "hehe" & "haha".
Heheheheheh

Dial it back grock! Dial it back!

Turns out that when all the wealth concentrates at the top those at the bottom don't have anymore money to spend. Who would have thought?

In fact even if you do have the skills it is very tempting to just take the quick answer you got. "Just this once doesn't matter right?" You already got the mental reward for finding an answer wich makes doing it "right" an extra chore to put off.

The problem with that comparison is that with bad digital skills back then you did not get to any answer. So you continued your search till you did. But with chat gpt you will always get an "answer". There is no impetus to learn any further skills as you already got what you want at a surface level

If only there wasn't this evil and intimidating horse

Multiple things can happen at the same time. I very much understand and appreciate the idea of "don't let them distract us". But with how often I have heard it said I must say; those other things are still happening. They need to be countered on all fronts. Acknowledgement is not being distracted

But if that wasn't the lesson what does she think the lesson is? The holocaust would have been fine if it was targeted at any other demographic? Truly a bizarre thing to say that "powerful people opressing weak people" is not a bad thing.

Ah fair

Plus, you can compare the rate of content creation over time. For example if before gpt you see 1 suspicious website set up per week and after you see 10, then there is a good clue that something has changed. Does not have to be gpt ofc. But it is an likely candidate

Probably web crawlers. Also look the increase of ai articles before chatgpt. It's not just LLMs. Also certain text are more likely to be ai written given the goal of that text. Think texts made just for seo. It will not be perfectly accurate but for stats only you compensate with an error rate

Teaching is the last thing i would want to see that man doing...

What about red arrows? Are those still okay?

After presumably having caused it himself