An interesting chat I had with Claude that seems appropriate for the moment, especially the bit about cyclical credibility crashes.

You'll get better answers by clearly defining "improve." Specific and detailed prompts guide the model, while vague ones risk misinterpretation and less relevant results.

Accounts with names or descriptions suggesting they share natural world photography but primarily post AI-generated images aren't worth following.

Nothing secures your place at the top of the food chain like wearing a porpoise on your head when everyone else is wearing a salmon.