But since PM got errata'd from “it gains” to “it has,” it no longer works the same as SD under 706.9e (now 707.9e). So while it still can’t result in infinite regression, the reason is that each time new copiable characteristics are applied, the previous characteristic modifications are lost, right?

2. If Necromancy’s ETB ability triggers twice (e.g., via Yarok) and each targets a different card, after they resolves, would Necromancy die to state-based action(704.5m) because it can’t satisfy both enchant restrictions(702.5c)?
(3/3)

So, I come up with two related scenarios:
1. Can Necromancy return Grist, the Hunger Tide to the battlefield and remain attached to it?
(2/3)

Hi @wotcmatt.bsky.social
I have some interactions I’d like to confirm:
Given rules 607.1, 607.1a and 607.2c, the ETB and Enchant ability of Necromancy are linked, correct? And based on 109.2, the word “creature” in the Enchant ability refers to the specific object rather than a card type.
(1/3)

@wotcmatt.bsky.social @natedogg.bsky.social
Hi,
I control Koh, the Face Stealer with Arcbound Overseer chosen with it, giving it the triggered part of modular and the “put +1/+1 on each creature w/ modular” trigger. Does Koh count as having modular for that trigger? What about Zabaz’s replacement?

What about Ajani, Nacatl Avenger? Would he be changed to the "whenever reflexive" template?