Hevah
@hevah.bsky.social
Mainly here for the Formula One chat. Also from Stevenage.
Oh, yes, apples. I think I tend towards apples in the pudding (over carrots) rather than mincemeat, but I am open to apples.
Of course my Mum also put gravy browning in the pudding, being old enough to have grown up when that was a post war necessity. It's funny what sticks.
Of course my Mum also put gravy browning in the pudding, being old enough to have grown up when that was a post war necessity. It's funny what sticks.
December 4, 2025 at 7:07 PM
Oh, yes, apples. I think I tend towards apples in the pudding (over carrots) rather than mincemeat, but I am open to apples.
Of course my Mum also put gravy browning in the pudding, being old enough to have grown up when that was a post war necessity. It's funny what sticks.
Of course my Mum also put gravy browning in the pudding, being old enough to have grown up when that was a post war necessity. It's funny what sticks.
No butter. Must be suet.
Don't get all those recipes pimping store bought - do or not, there is no try.
I'm very flexible on fruit though, but I recommend some sour cherries in there somewhere.
Don't get all those recipes pimping store bought - do or not, there is no try.
I'm very flexible on fruit though, but I recommend some sour cherries in there somewhere.
December 3, 2025 at 8:27 PM
No butter. Must be suet.
Don't get all those recipes pimping store bought - do or not, there is no try.
I'm very flexible on fruit though, but I recommend some sour cherries in there somewhere.
Don't get all those recipes pimping store bought - do or not, there is no try.
I'm very flexible on fruit though, but I recommend some sour cherries in there somewhere.
Thought parc ferme is over after the sprint tho, and by that point they do have a lot more data to tweak. Plus damaged parts can be replaced.
But I'm no engineer and I'm thousands of miles away, so I'm hardly going to argue about it.
I prefer this conspiracy theory to the Antonelli one :-)
But I'm no engineer and I'm thousands of miles away, so I'm hardly going to argue about it.
I prefer this conspiracy theory to the Antonelli one :-)
December 1, 2025 at 5:22 PM
Thought parc ferme is over after the sprint tho, and by that point they do have a lot more data to tweak. Plus damaged parts can be replaced.
But I'm no engineer and I'm thousands of miles away, so I'm hardly going to argue about it.
I prefer this conspiracy theory to the Antonelli one :-)
But I'm no engineer and I'm thousands of miles away, so I'm hardly going to argue about it.
I prefer this conspiracy theory to the Antonelli one :-)
Acting on it to abuse a driver, or anyone, is just idiocy though.
Good grief.
Good grief.
December 1, 2025 at 11:32 AM
Acting on it to abuse a driver, or anyone, is just idiocy though.
Good grief.
Good grief.
I blame the #f1 movie for all this jumping at shadows. Or possibly Massa and his court case.
People should get back to old school conspiracy theories about the ways the teams are messing with the technical regulations.
People should get back to old school conspiracy theories about the ways the teams are messing with the technical regulations.
December 1, 2025 at 11:02 AM
I blame the #f1 movie for all this jumping at shadows. Or possibly Massa and his court case.
People should get back to old school conspiracy theories about the ways the teams are messing with the technical regulations.
People should get back to old school conspiracy theories about the ways the teams are messing with the technical regulations.
Anyway.
It's one thing to get momentarily caught out, and quite another to insist on taking it seriously.
It's one thing to get momentarily caught out, and quite another to insist on taking it seriously.
December 1, 2025 at 10:44 AM
Anyway.
It's one thing to get momentarily caught out, and quite another to insist on taking it seriously.
It's one thing to get momentarily caught out, and quite another to insist on taking it seriously.
All of the above, probably.
But despite the fact it's not the first tongue in cheek remark we've heard, when GP first mentioned the Antonelli mistake, even the commentators gave it some consideration.
Because, as with social media, there are some contexts where joking takes people by surprise.
But despite the fact it's not the first tongue in cheek remark we've heard, when GP first mentioned the Antonelli mistake, even the commentators gave it some consideration.
Because, as with social media, there are some contexts where joking takes people by surprise.
December 1, 2025 at 10:40 AM
All of the above, probably.
But despite the fact it's not the first tongue in cheek remark we've heard, when GP first mentioned the Antonelli mistake, even the commentators gave it some consideration.
Because, as with social media, there are some contexts where joking takes people by surprise.
But despite the fact it's not the first tongue in cheek remark we've heard, when GP first mentioned the Antonelli mistake, even the commentators gave it some consideration.
Because, as with social media, there are some contexts where joking takes people by surprise.
Well, I assume they made good use of the break in parc ferme after the sprint to ponder the data and listen to driver feedback.
It's not a one off, though, is my point. They always do it.
And while I sympathise with the Red Bull car 2 horror, currently not giving a fig for it is the right choice
It's not a one off, though, is my point. They always do it.
And while I sympathise with the Red Bull car 2 horror, currently not giving a fig for it is the right choice
December 1, 2025 at 5:33 AM
Well, I assume they made good use of the break in parc ferme after the sprint to ponder the data and listen to driver feedback.
It's not a one off, though, is my point. They always do it.
And while I sympathise with the Red Bull car 2 horror, currently not giving a fig for it is the right choice
It's not a one off, though, is my point. They always do it.
And while I sympathise with the Red Bull car 2 horror, currently not giving a fig for it is the right choice
Can't split the strategies.
Although to be fair the other teams didn't split the strategies either.
But, can't risk doing something that would risk advantaging one over the other (stacking the cars, here).
Although to be fair the other teams didn't split the strategies either.
But, can't risk doing something that would risk advantaging one over the other (stacking the cars, here).
November 30, 2025 at 6:06 PM
Can't split the strategies.
Although to be fair the other teams didn't split the strategies either.
But, can't risk doing something that would risk advantaging one over the other (stacking the cars, here).
Although to be fair the other teams didn't split the strategies either.
But, can't risk doing something that would risk advantaging one over the other (stacking the cars, here).
A deserved dig tho. A deserved shout out for Schmitz too.
November 30, 2025 at 5:48 PM
A deserved dig tho. A deserved shout out for Schmitz too.
I wonder what a Teresa car is, mind you.
November 30, 2025 at 5:34 PM
I wonder what a Teresa car is, mind you.