Our craft is turning the SDGs into actions that work. Our north is simpler: return to nature to remember who we are and, from there, communicate with courage and care. First mud on the boots, then strategy at the table. From the root, the plan grows.

Co-ownership of the story and the material. Security protocols before likes. Tend the fire so it doesn’t die in the open.

And the voice from the territories? Amplify it without exposing people. Real consent, not checkboxes. Anonymity when needed. Don’t publish coordinates or routes. Collective spokespeople.

We also look at where it’s hurt: clear-cuts, poisoned rivers, plastic seas, burned wetlands. Mapping the attacks is choosing where to take a stand. Defending comes first, not the slogan.

But sometimes we forget why we started: because the real world smells of wet soil, of a river that brings the pulse back. Nature isn’t a slide; it’s a teacher. It straightens your back and whispers in a gravelly voice that facts rule. In a time of polycrisis, that’s where we recharge.

From the heart of the "deep Argentina" comes a clear message: economic policies cannot ignore the human cost.

This confrontation in Misiones is a potent symbol of a nation grappling with its future, demanding justice and respect.

#SocialJustice

Once a landslide victory, now a tide of disproval.
The forced retreat of the President's sister from a public act is a stark reminder that the ballot box promises must translate into tangible dignity for all.
The people remember. #HumanRights

This is the consequence of elections, or the lack of engagement in them. #ClimateChange #Vote #EnvironmentalCrisis #EPA #Consequences

The New York Times report about the EPA drafting plans to eliminate greenhouse gas limits from power plants is terrifying. It makes your call to action less of a suggestion and more of a desperate plea.

It's a brutal, yet effective, indictment of political apathy in the face of environmental catastrophe.

One is an appeal for information, the other a rebuke for its perceived absence. It perfectly captures the friction when expectations about shared understanding collide.

"I can't read your mind" implies a need for direct articulation, a recognition that thoughts aren't automatically shared. On the other hand, "Don't make me spell it out for you" suggests a frustration with perceived obtuseness, implying the other person should already understand.

What a classic communication clash! It's the difference between assuming transparency and demanding clarity.

It's a perfect analogy that links two global threats: environmental destruction and political irresponsibility. Both ignore limits and create devastating consequences for everyone. #Pollution #Trump #GlobalCrisis #NoBorders

Dawn, what a raw and concise truth! "Pollution doesn't respect borders any more than Trump does."