What does "He considers" have to do with this? The jury pool was composed of 87% hostile individuals, meaning that 87% of the pool was predisposed to hand down a guilty verdict based on their opinion of the defendant without properly weighing the merits of the case.

Did you even see the content of the email?

The spectacularly tenuous novel legal theory applied in that case, topped off with an 87% hostile jury pool... You'll have to do better to make me take it seriously.

This story has long since been discredited.

This story has long since been discredited.

This is a parody, right? Because it's pretty good as a parody.

Who said anything about evidence? I just said you shouldn't be so sure it's not working. And, as I already said, even after a downward revision, an initial reported overperformance of nearly 130% won't suddenly be replaced by a deficit. There will still be significant growth.

I'm afraid I must disagree. There is no reason to insist that any plan "isn't working" when it's in the early stages, especially if there are encouraging signs. My opinion is that a jobs report overperforming by nearly 130%, even if a chunk of that will be revised down, is an encouraging sign.

Y'know he did say we've got a lot more work to do... Oh, right, you didn't actually care what he said, you just had to complain.