Presumably you have 'clear', as in "I have been/am clear", including all modifiers (very, extremely...).
April 28, 2025 at 6:55 AM
Presumably you have 'clear', as in "I have been/am clear", including all modifiers (very, extremely...).
LOL, knock yourself out ?
February 10, 2025 at 9:49 PM
LOL, knock yourself out ?
Yes indeed. I reckon I can clock a man in a wig, dress and lipstick, 99% of the time. Few 'pass'. The more troubling is the trans-identified females, who of course should be able to use the female bathrooms. Testosterone is a powerful drug.
February 10, 2025 at 2:33 PM
Yes indeed. I reckon I can clock a man in a wig, dress and lipstick, 99% of the time. Few 'pass'. The more troubling is the trans-identified females, who of course should be able to use the female bathrooms. Testosterone is a powerful drug.
Why are you 'issue bundling'? I am pro-choice and don't understand the relevance? I happen to think gender ideology is the more regressive and misogynistic. It focuses on gender stereotypes, forces women to give up their safe spaces, opportunities and accolades - to men.
February 10, 2025 at 2:24 PM
Why are you 'issue bundling'? I am pro-choice and don't understand the relevance? I happen to think gender ideology is the more regressive and misogynistic. It focuses on gender stereotypes, forces women to give up their safe spaces, opportunities and accolades - to men.
Well, I'm not an evolutionary biologist, but I understand that it normally takes a matter of microseconds for a female to clock a male. As I said, obviously mistakes will be made. However, we need to get back to sex-based rules and norms. It used to work, do you not think?
February 10, 2025 at 2:07 PM
Well, I'm not an evolutionary biologist, but I understand that it normally takes a matter of microseconds for a female to clock a male. As I said, obviously mistakes will be made. However, we need to get back to sex-based rules and norms. It used to work, do you not think?
You're the one talking of genital inspections, not me. You're the one assuming nefarious reasons for transitioning, not me. Why assume I have 'fellow travellers'? Who are they? I believe I answered your 'operationalise' thing.
February 10, 2025 at 1:39 PM
You're the one talking of genital inspections, not me. You're the one assuming nefarious reasons for transitioning, not me. Why assume I have 'fellow travellers'? Who are they? I believe I answered your 'operationalise' thing.
Oh come on! I really don't understand your obsession with genitals. There used to be norms regarding bathrooms. Mistakes will be made. It used to work. And for sports - yes, cheek swabs. One and done, for life (since sex is NOT mutable).
February 10, 2025 at 1:31 PM
Oh come on! I really don't understand your obsession with genitals. There used to be norms regarding bathrooms. Mistakes will be made. It used to work. And for sports - yes, cheek swabs. One and done, for life (since sex is NOT mutable).
It's a nonsense question. I really don't care what his reasons are. The fact is he's male, however much he wishes he were not. He needs to deal with that - it's not up to women to accommodate him and give up our privacy, dignity and safety in our single sexed spaces.
February 10, 2025 at 1:26 PM
It's a nonsense question. I really don't care what his reasons are. The fact is he's male, however much he wishes he were not. He needs to deal with that - it's not up to women to accommodate him and give up our privacy, dignity and safety in our single sexed spaces.
Well, I have a right to believe it doesn't exist and to say so. I also have a right to single sex spaces, based on sex not 'gender'.
February 10, 2025 at 1:13 PM
Well, I have a right to believe it doesn't exist and to say so. I also have a right to single sex spaces, based on sex not 'gender'.
'...in that locker room we turned around, and there’s a 6’4" biological man dropping his pants and watching us undress...' As always, a woman's words are not believed and 'presumptions' made.
February 10, 2025 at 1:11 PM
'...in that locker room we turned around, and there’s a 6’4" biological man dropping his pants and watching us undress...' As always, a woman's words are not believed and 'presumptions' made.
Of course! This thread started with commentary on Janice Turner's article. Did you not read it?
February 10, 2025 at 12:54 PM
Of course! This thread started with commentary on Janice Turner's article. Did you not read it?
I believe Paula Scanlan has said similar. I understand you don't like them. Does that mean they are lying? Who don't I tolerate?
February 10, 2025 at 12:53 PM
I believe Paula Scanlan has said similar. I understand you don't like them. Does that mean they are lying? Who don't I tolerate?
lol indeed. It means I don't subscribe to gender identity beliefs. (I'm also an atheist, FWIW.) Furthermore, I'm a liberal, and entirely tolerant of your beliefs - to the extent that you don't impinge on my rights/liberties.
February 10, 2025 at 12:21 PM
lol indeed. It means I don't subscribe to gender identity beliefs. (I'm also an atheist, FWIW.) Furthermore, I'm a liberal, and entirely tolerant of your beliefs - to the extent that you don't impinge on my rights/liberties.
Lia Thomas's team mates have reported that he would watch them undress in the changing room. (An activity that could take some considerable time, given the material used in their special costumes.)
February 10, 2025 at 11:14 AM
Lia Thomas's team mates have reported that he would watch them undress in the changing room. (An activity that could take some considerable time, given the material used in their special costumes.)
Alito's questions sound reasonable, relevant and pertinent to me?
December 4, 2024 at 9:08 PM
Alito's questions sound reasonable, relevant and pertinent to me?