Masdar’s stalled progress highlights the gap between ambition and implementation. The tech was there, but systemic change , energy, transport, governance, has to move with it for real impact. I think it's an example of when the government has moved too fast and its citizens weren't ready.

It’s encouraging to see sustainability at the core, but 'exclusive amenities' often raise questions about accessibility to all parties. A truly smart city works for everyone, not just a select few.

Interesting to see Kazakhstan investing in a border city like this. If Nurkent can attract long-term residents and businesses, it could become a real way between Central Asia and China.

Masdar’s model is inspiring, but also a reminder that tech and design alone aren’t enough - affordability, accessibility, and community life matter also, if we want sustainable cities that actually work for the people that live in them.

It’s both a response to Cairo’s chaos and a tool for regime stability. In Egypt, megaprojects often serve multiple agendas for infrastructure, image, and influence all at once.

Sounds promising, integrating jobs and transit could make a big difference. The real test will be whether those 'affordable' homes and jobs actually reach the people who need them most.

Eko Atlantic highlights how climate adaptation can deepen inequality if resilience is treated as a 'luxury good'. True climate justice means protecting everyone, not just those who can afford high walls and private generators.

The rising sea level problem is the one that stands out most to me. With all the engineering problems already associated with 'new cities' why choose a place with a severe risk to rising sea levels?

Very interesting to see if Bhutan will have the budget to keep up with the $100B for the city! A very large oppprtunity cost is associated with the building of the city.

Exactly, it looks more like a prestige project than a real fix for many of Cairo’s problems. You can’t just build your way out of inequality and overcrowding.