Walter Fürst
@heastoida.bsky.social
I'm rated 2050, and I agree the signs are all there it might be promising, but really prefer it over an extra pawn w/out risk? I probably wouldn't play it, even if I dug much deeper into it during a rated game than I did just now.
November 5, 2025 at 12:06 PM
I'm rated 2050, and I agree the signs are all there it might be promising, but really prefer it over an extra pawn w/out risk? I probably wouldn't play it, even if I dug much deeper into it during a rated game than I did just now.
I saw the idea, but rejected it because it seemed very unclear to me. Also I don't know if it makes much sense for a human, as Nxh5 gives a nice advantage risk-free. What rating would you have to be to confidently prefer this over Nxh5? It can't be calculated to a conclusion, you have to evaluate.
November 5, 2025 at 11:59 AM
I saw the idea, but rejected it because it seemed very unclear to me. Also I don't know if it makes much sense for a human, as Nxh5 gives a nice advantage risk-free. What rating would you have to be to confidently prefer this over Nxh5? It can't be calculated to a conclusion, you have to evaluate.
Reposted by Walter Fürst
Firesky
Watch every Bluesky post in real-time – filter the firehose
firesky.tv
November 24, 2024 at 4:58 AM