No, but you should learn the difference between a companionship and what goals are.

you assume I have friends

I luv this girl so much..too pretti…

Very distinct.

You asked why I think it’s important and I replied with because misconstruing others statements for your yesmen is NOT good faith. This was never set up to be a good faith discussion.

~you said~ “just because,” how is that extrapolating on my end. You used absolute lang.

friends ≠ shared goal

“Al changes the hotel branding thus they’re a dynamic duo.” You said that that’s the sole reason people held this expectation. You could certainly be representing peoples, but it’s silly and not worth your time. It’s important because you have a following of yesmen.

I did. I can remind you that my initial reply was in response to them not sharing a goal. You still never told me how you contrived that. I ignored it because it seems like I’m beating a dead horse.

you mentioned the “kind of” wording (and it’s wrong). you said you were being hyperbolic which in itself misconstrues.

people (such as myself) had that expectation for other reasons, not just the renaming of the hotel. vaggi deserves to be the manager after everything in s2 (lol).

kind of meant to have a shared goal. ? Their goals don’t align, and if they do somewhat, we don’t know yet.

You’re posting this misconstrued version of their take. That’s harmful and misrep. their statement causes confusion. If you want your refuting to have weight please don’t do this.

No thesaurus. ad hominem. I’ve been straightforward but alas. I’m not sure how you contrived that they “share a goal” from everything that I’ve seen. You can’t refute a take whilst misinterpreting it.

Maybe ask them about it instead of this triangulation.
Is that your takeaway? i never scolded you. I did consistently ask you to explain your erroneous inference. this conversation is futile because you keep deflecting.

That is their opinion. You failed to mention the latter part of this para in your initial tweet that I was replying to. What was disingenuous was your straw-man tweet, not this polished elaboration. Again, how does this imply that they share a goal? TwT

I was replying to your disingenuous interpretation. that take doesn’t necessarily imply that they share a goal. I said that no CA fan thinks this bc they had to have not watched the show at all to think that. It’s okay for people to lament the protagonist’s and deuteragonist’s lack of interaction.

There is no shared goal. that’s the intrigue. No ch/rlastor fan (whether it be platonic or not) thinks this. He’s this blithe pessimist who challenges her optimism…even in the pilot it’s obvious that he has ulterior motives/doesn’t share this “goal.” Where did you get this? LOL.