@haywoodfloyd.bsky.social
The $47.5K of interest payments on the $112K amount financed (ie the full purchase price) is right there in the disclosure boxes. This isn't some bait and switch. This guy wants to pay no money down. He's just pissed that he has to pay for that.
November 27, 2025 at 6:32 PM
The $47.5K of interest payments on the $112K amount financed (ie the full purchase price) is right there in the disclosure boxes. This isn't some bait and switch. This guy wants to pay no money down. He's just pissed that he has to pay for that.
Don't even need a finance class to figure this one out. The $47k finance charge on the $111k truck is right there in the disclosure form.
November 27, 2025 at 6:28 PM
Don't even need a finance class to figure this one out. The $47k finance charge on the $111k truck is right there in the disclosure form.
You mean not run again. Collins will never resign her Senate seat.
November 26, 2025 at 4:36 AM
You mean not run again. Collins will never resign her Senate seat.
The DOJ is going to need a budget comparable to the DOD budget.
November 23, 2025 at 4:25 AM
The DOJ is going to need a budget comparable to the DOD budget.
When you accurately model their respective positions there's nothing implausible about it.
November 23, 2025 at 4:23 AM
JFK's brother was on the Warren Commission.
The really weird thing is Jack Ruby murdering Oswald. Pretty sure that set off most of the conspiracies. If Oswald sits in prison for 3-4 years before being executed, no conspiracies.
The really weird thing is Jack Ruby murdering Oswald. Pretty sure that set off most of the conspiracies. If Oswald sits in prison for 3-4 years before being executed, no conspiracies.
November 23, 2025 at 4:15 AM
JFK's brother was on the Warren Commission.
The really weird thing is Jack Ruby murdering Oswald. Pretty sure that set off most of the conspiracies. If Oswald sits in prison for 3-4 years before being executed, no conspiracies.
The really weird thing is Jack Ruby murdering Oswald. Pretty sure that set off most of the conspiracies. If Oswald sits in prison for 3-4 years before being executed, no conspiracies.
Mamdani was very careful to avoid saying anything directly complimentary about Trump and just stood there letting Trump slobber all over him.
Won't have any long term impact, but Steven Miller was screaming at his TV and every racist in MAGA was saying "Uh, WTF?" That's a small win in my book.
Won't have any long term impact, but Steven Miller was screaming at his TV and every racist in MAGA was saying "Uh, WTF?" That's a small win in my book.
November 22, 2025 at 2:27 AM
Mamdani was very careful to avoid saying anything directly complimentary about Trump and just stood there letting Trump slobber all over him.
Won't have any long term impact, but Steven Miller was screaming at his TV and every racist in MAGA was saying "Uh, WTF?" That's a small win in my book.
Won't have any long term impact, but Steven Miller was screaming at his TV and every racist in MAGA was saying "Uh, WTF?" That's a small win in my book.
Mamdani was very careful to avoid directly praising Trump. He talked about how some voters for whom affordability was an important issue voted for Trump. That's true, but it's a descriptive rather than normative statement - he left unsaid that any such voters were idiots.
November 22, 2025 at 2:16 AM
Mamdani was very careful to avoid directly praising Trump. He talked about how some voters for whom affordability was an important issue voted for Trump. That's true, but it's a descriptive rather than normative statement - he left unsaid that any such voters were idiots.
Evil asshole was slobbering over Mamdani, admitting that it was OK to call him(Trump) a fascist while Mamdani stuck to his campaign talking points and carefully avoiding any meaningful praise of Trump.
It's OK to take a moment on a Friday to enjoy watching Trump embarrass himself.
It's OK to take a moment on a Friday to enjoy watching Trump embarrass himself.
November 22, 2025 at 2:10 AM
Evil asshole was slobbering over Mamdani, admitting that it was OK to call him(Trump) a fascist while Mamdani stuck to his campaign talking points and carefully avoiding any meaningful praise of Trump.
It's OK to take a moment on a Friday to enjoy watching Trump embarrass himself.
It's OK to take a moment on a Friday to enjoy watching Trump embarrass himself.
What a shitty remake of Clerks...
November 22, 2025 at 2:03 AM
What a shitty remake of Clerks...
Are you fucking kidding me?
bsky.app/profile/numb...
bsky.app/profile/numb...
November 22, 2025 at 1:58 AM
Are you fucking kidding me?
bsky.app/profile/numb...
bsky.app/profile/numb...
Trying to decide whether this is real or NYT Pitchbot before I check....
November 22, 2025 at 1:57 AM
Trying to decide whether this is real or NYT Pitchbot before I check....
Reposted
One thing worth adding about Yarvin is how he handles the question of “who picks the sovereign.” He never gives a real mechanism. The gap is intentional, it lets every audience project their preferred strong executive into his model.
November 20, 2025 at 11:50 AM
One thing worth adding about Yarvin is how he handles the question of “who picks the sovereign.” He never gives a real mechanism. The gap is intentional, it lets every audience project their preferred strong executive into his model.
I mean, if the next Dem president missile strikes Hegseth, RFK and Musk, then I think you are being a bit too harsh here.
November 20, 2025 at 5:54 AM
I mean, if the next Dem president missile strikes Hegseth, RFK and Musk, then I think you are being a bit too harsh here.
Mamdani shows up with an oversized Key to the City and Trumpcare suddenly becomes Medicare for All...
November 20, 2025 at 3:27 AM
Mamdani shows up with an oversized Key to the City and Trumpcare suddenly becomes Medicare for All...
November 20, 2025 at 3:24 AM
Mamdani shows up with an oversized Key to the City and Trumpcare suddenly becomes Medicare for All...
Jeffrey Dahmer's culinary habits were met with resistance from the courts.
November 20, 2025 at 3:16 AM
Jeffrey Dahmer's culinary habits were met with resistance from the courts.
TBH, Schumer is pretty good with the clever procedural stuff. That's just not sufficient (or important) for being a caucus leader. Particularly a wartime leader.
November 19, 2025 at 8:35 AM
TBH, Schumer is pretty good with the clever procedural stuff. That's just not sufficient (or important) for being a caucus leader. Particularly a wartime leader.
I unfortunately have to hand it to Schumer. I think he made Thune choose between (1) trying to hold it back and get overwhelmed like in the House (and having it fester in his caucus for a while), or (2) fuck over Mike Johnson. And Thune choose door #2 with a smile.
bsky.app/profile/andy...
bsky.app/profile/andy...
Rare occasion to be nice: Schumer's UC move was clever and effective and the right thing to do. It wasn't about dodging a recorded vote, it was jamming it through ASAP to kill any attempt to delay. It's an example of what can be done, if you really want, with procedural creativity on the floor.
November 19, 2025 at 8:32 AM
I unfortunately have to hand it to Schumer. I think he made Thune choose between (1) trying to hold it back and get overwhelmed like in the House (and having it fester in his caucus for a while), or (2) fuck over Mike Johnson. And Thune choose door #2 with a smile.
bsky.app/profile/andy...
bsky.app/profile/andy...
Part of the issue is the Dixiefication of rural America. Seeing the stars and bars being flown in rural Iowa (by some folks whose great great grandfathers fought for the Union) is so jarring that it's hard to remember that these dipshits are merely aping the original flavor.
November 17, 2025 at 7:57 PM
Part of the issue is the Dixiefication of rural America. Seeing the stars and bars being flown in rural Iowa (by some folks whose great great grandfathers fought for the Union) is so jarring that it's hard to remember that these dipshits are merely aping the original flavor.
Not how it works in a federal district court, either.
November 17, 2025 at 7:41 PM
Not how it works in a federal district court, either.
Yes, correct. The point stands that Congress decides the dispute and the GOP house (plus Jeb Bush's certification as FL Governor) would have resulted in Bush winning if SCOTUS had not taken cert on Bush v Gore.
November 17, 2025 at 8:19 AM
Yes, correct. The point stands that Congress decides the dispute and the GOP house (plus Jeb Bush's certification as FL Governor) would have resulted in Bush winning if SCOTUS had not taken cert on Bush v Gore.
Sorry - it was Breyer's dissent - that the House should decide whether to accept Bush's electors or reject them (or hypothetically accept a Gore slate of FL electors, but it never got to that).
www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/0...
www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/0...
BUSH v. GORE
www.law.cornell.edu
November 17, 2025 at 7:56 AM
Sorry - it was Breyer's dissent - that the House should decide whether to accept Bush's electors or reject them (or hypothetically accept a Gore slate of FL electors, but it never got to that).
www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/0...
www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/0...