Hayden 🎮🧗🏳️‍🌈🐝
haydensmith.bsky.social
Hayden 🎮🧗🏳️‍🌈🐝
@haydensmith.bsky.social
Bouldering🧗 Gaymer🏳️‍🌈🎮 Bad jokes💀 Gym💪 Programmer💻 Salford / Manchester🐝
It kinda stands out that even with all the current shit Starmer beats all the options including Farage in a landslide.
June 15, 2025 at 7:58 PM
First response to what is a potentially a volatile situation with them ship.

He has a legal responsibility to protect that ship.

The plane is there to watch Israel, not a few protesters.
June 8, 2025 at 9:12 PM
Israel absolutely will act more cautiously and hopefully legally with the fact the Starmer has sent a spy plane to watch what's going on.

The plane is there to watch Israel.
June 8, 2025 at 9:09 PM
I'm sorry for being short but this is really really. Rightly or wrongly Israel has been given a metric ton of modern weaponry and defence. They know exactly where it is and know how to destroy it.

The people on the ship don't give a fuck Starmer is watching what's going on.
June 8, 2025 at 9:07 PM
What is wrong with the Spy plane? To me it's more an action today protect it then attack it.
June 8, 2025 at 9:01 PM
Why is sending a spy plane so wrong. Seems like a way to signal he would intervene if Israel too hostile action.

Seems more like a sending a signal to Israel, fairly standard diplomacy tbh.
June 8, 2025 at 9:00 PM
What's wrong with the Spy plane exactly? Doest he have a responsibility to to keep them safe under maritime law?

Doing nothing could be negligence. Fighter jets could be overkill.
June 8, 2025 at 8:57 PM
Could mean a lot of things such as sending a simple sign to Netanyahu that we are keeping an eye on this ship and intend to follow our internal obligations etc.
June 8, 2025 at 8:54 PM
He has a legal responsibility to keep them safe, under maritime law. A plane to keep an eye on over a potentially volatile situation is surely an appropriate first response? Especially since Israel has been threatening them?

Please correct me if I'm misunderstanding what's happened here.
June 8, 2025 at 8:53 PM
It's because the net approval is negative indicating more people disapprove than approve. No conspiracy.
May 8, 2025 at 12:40 PM
My point is labour didn't have that many seats to lose. So even if they didn't many seats of its seats from labour, labour could have still lost lots of it's seats to reform
May 2, 2025 at 5:03 PM
Don't think about it in terms of raw numbers. If Labour lost that many seats that % went reform and what % went wherever else.
May 2, 2025 at 4:55 PM
It's not that simple. Tories have lost Devon to the Libs. Labour lost loads to reform in Durham.

Also if you listen to what a lot of the reform voters want it sounds like Labour lost votes to them for being too right wing which makes it even messier.
May 2, 2025 at 4:09 PM
It adjusts for areas that didn't have council elections. John Curtice doesn't bang rocks together for a living.
May 2, 2025 at 4:06 PM
You have to remember this set of elections is kinda the Tories base. And they are set to come third place.
May 2, 2025 at 3:42 PM
Again?
May 2, 2025 at 2:03 PM
I'm just saying they are both getting hurt about the same but it's one thing to have a shit night when in government, but it takes a lot to have a bad night in opposition.
May 2, 2025 at 1:55 PM
Looks like they are both getting hurt about the same, losing 2/3s of thier seats.
May 2, 2025 at 1:49 PM
To me the choice feels like a party that did austerity 15 years ago took a beating for it and may or may not have learned from it vs a party doing it now and proudly plowing ahead with certainty.
May 2, 2025 at 1:48 PM
It's the second.
May 2, 2025 at 12:05 PM
Tories are coming off a high point where they could only go down.

Labour are coming from a low point where the assumption was they didn't have that many seats left to lose.
May 2, 2025 at 11:57 AM
It's impressive how unpopular Kemi is when all she has to do is point out the unpopular things Starmer is doing. Instead of fighting paper bags and shit talking sandwiches.
April 16, 2025 at 12:24 PM