Why do you use the Internet? It does much more harm to the environment than AI. This has also been proven by scientists. Stop using what is killing the environment.

If you want society to be intolerant of AI in creative spaces, perhaps start by showing a more respectful tone yourself. As I mentioned, I haven’t found an artist - I’d gladly work with one if I could. Try to solve this problem, and not deprive the world of tools that help people.

Sorry, but I would not like to continue the dialogue with you. Perhaps we should part ways to save each other's time. You can spend it on yourself, and I on myself. Time will tell whose position was correct. Do you agree?

Have you tried to tone down your aggression a little? Most conflicts in the world are due to this kind of behavior.
I didn't do anything bad to you for you to treat me like this.
And please read it more carefully. If there was such an artist, I would be only glad

You are right that this should not be the future of creativity. As a creative person - I absolutely support this. Creativity is imperfection, that is the beauty of it.
But I don't agree that this is not a revolution. It helps a lot in the current realities.

Note, I am in no way devaluing your problem! It is important! But there are more important things.

You have completely forgotten the positives. You absolutely deny the progress that this has brought. It is like denying the recognition of the earth being round, or the development of electricity.
You don't see other, more important problems in the world.

You are too categorical. I repeat, I understand and accept your position that stealing is bad. Otherwise, there are no downsides.

Why do you support reader mode if it deprives authors of income from viewing ads?
Your arguments are already working against you.
Also, the sites are not deprived of traffic, and they can block AI access to them. Yes, this feature was added only after the lawsuit, but it was done

I respect the authors and their work, and I also agree with your opinion that stealing is bad, and I understand your concern about this.
Do they just have to change their policies for you to accept them?
In this case, we should not forget about the open LLM models that did not steal anything.

I don't think it's bad. What's bad is that the site developers don't care about UX design.
I'll happily visit a normal website, even if it has ads.
But I don’t like, for example, that it’s difficult for Wikipedia to change 2 parameters in CSS.

I split my tweet incorrectly, sorry. You are absolutely right. The last sentence was for the next post.

For example, I have come across terribly written articles by journalists. And as a user, I would like to filter this from the internet.
AI helps filter this content from the rest. Doesn't it do more good than harm?

I think vector search is a great thing. Additionally, a LLM can compress information.
There are many authors in the world who are negligent in their work.

Is this an AI problem? It's a human problem. No one is stopping you from improving yourself.
I don't know the usage statistics, but I use GPT as a replacement for Google, simply because hundreds of sites decided not to make a dark theme. This is a basic function.

You're right about that. And then they sell it to the same people. Although, I like that they try to keep it free for hundreds of millions of people. I don't think that AI will replace humans, but on the contrary, it will make them work even harder on themselves.

I disagree. There used to be messengers, but now there aren't any. Essentially, the profession was killed by internet technology.

I wanted to object, but you are partly right. I think that in this or that there is a particle of good and bad. The same was once said about TV or other discoveries of mankind. But thanks to this, we no longer wait 2 months for letters to be delivered, but exchange them instantly.