Yes ,because both can intrude on individual privacy and fundamental rights. Without equivalent safeguards, private firms can exploit regulatory gaps to conduct intrusive monitoring with limited accountability.

Yes ,because both can intrude on individual privacy and fundamental rights. Without equivalent safeguards, private firms can exploit regulatory gaps to conduct intrusive monitoring with limited accountability.

Police departments should not broadly be allowed to use AI-powered facial recognition on body cameras because it creates serious privacy risks and increases the chance of biased or incorrect identification. Continuous scanning of the public can undermine civil liberties, while known accuracy gaps

Should the use of facial recognition technology by police be banned because it disproportionately misidentifies minority groups?

To a significant extent, police use of AI-powered facial recognition on body cameras should be limited and carefully regulated because:
The technology can infringe on privacy rights by scanning and identifying people in public without consent

To a significant extent, police use of AI-powered facial recognition on body cameras should be limited and carefully regulated because:
The technology can infringe on privacy rights by scanning and identifying people in public without consent

To a significant extent, police use of AI-powered facial recognition on body cameras should be limited and carefully regulated because:
The technology can infringe on privacy rights by scanning and identifying people in public without consent

To what extent should police use Al-powered facial recognition on body cameras, given concerns about privacy, bias, and public safety?

Should police use real-time facial recognition on body cameras given the risks to privacy and potential bias in the technology?

Yes, U.S. tech companies should be held ethically accountable for how their technologies are used in foreign surveillance states like China, even if they are not legally responsible in every case.

Yes, U.S. tech companies should be held ethically accountable for how their technologies are used in foreign surveillance states like China, even if they are not legally responsible in every case.

Yes, U.S. tech companies should be held ethically accountable for how their technologies are used in foreign surveillance states like China, even if they are not legally responsible in every case.

Should American technology companies be held accountable for enabling foreign governments to build invasive mass-surveillance systems that are used to monitor, control, and repress citizens?