A dumb heuristic
Philosophy student (theoretical, logic)
Tinkerer
Most recently and probably importantly: new dad.
Cannot represent working class if you enjoy the fruits of your labour, faking poverty is the best way to respect your voters.
Cannot represent working class if you enjoy the fruits of your labour, faking poverty is the best way to respect your voters.
But yeah, morally unforgivable is of course weaker than the game of capitalism
But yeah, morally unforgivable is of course weaker than the game of capitalism
???
"What up fellow socialists, shame about the racism huh, but we all agree it's fair and necessary right??"
???
"What up fellow socialists, shame about the racism huh, but we all agree it's fair and necessary right??"
¬∀x(Px) ⇔ ∃x(¬Px)
¬∃x(Px) ⇔ ∀x(¬Px)
The first one says all print jobs are finished, the second one says not all print jobs are finished, the third one says no print jobs are finished.
¬∀x(Px) ⇔ ∃x(¬Px)
¬∃x(Px) ⇔ ∀x(¬Px)
The first one says all print jobs are finished, the second one says not all print jobs are finished, the third one says no print jobs are finished.
∀x(Px) ⇔ ¬∃x(¬Px)
¬∀x(Px) ⇔ ∃x(¬Px)
¬∃x(Px) ⇔ ∀x(¬Px)
∀x(Px) ⇔ ¬∃x(¬Px)
¬∀x(Px) ⇔ ∃x(¬Px)
¬∃x(Px) ⇔ ∀x(¬Px)