Now, it is fun to have actual force damage user.
Now, it is fun to have actual force damage user.
I think this is a call for not having a limit.
I think this is a call for not having a limit.
Caster.
Inventor
All have mechanics that need emotional investment. Some effort to imagine.
Innovation is the perfect exemple. "They" see as the invention when every power is part of the invention.
Caster.
Inventor
All have mechanics that need emotional investment. Some effort to imagine.
Innovation is the perfect exemple. "They" see as the invention when every power is part of the invention.
(Or a feat from radadoum that say not patron deity but the player says he can take it because he worships a pantheon.)
(Or a feat from radadoum that say not patron deity but the player says he can take it because he worships a pantheon.)
It is not to argue. I am just genuinely interested in this. This is what it is missing for me.
That would not stop people from looking at a class or feat but not seeing the context of the book.
It is not to argue. I am just genuinely interested in this. This is what it is missing for me.
That would not stop people from looking at a class or feat but not seeing the context of the book.
Gosh, that spellcasters are wonderfully complex.
Gosh, that spellcasters are wonderfully complex.
Aid is a great action for the fighter. Underestimated. Why do two actions activity when you give a +2 or +3 at level 5?
Aid is a great action for the fighter. Underestimated. Why do two actions activity when you give a +2 or +3 at level 5?
This is gambler distortion.
I like the fighter, because it is simple. It is more likely to hit.
This is gambler distortion.
I like the fighter, because it is simple. It is more likely to hit.
So you had 16d4 in a long line against mooks?
So you had 16d4 in a long line against mooks?
But people remembers the crit success.
But people remembers the crit success.