"You guys suck-"
*teleports to mars 1 million years ago or some shit*

I need to show that object effects are objective? I think we're done here lmao.

You dont even know what youre saying lmao

Its really easy to feel smart when you dont say anything

Its not just harm, thats a short hand.. morality is based on the material outcome of our actions. It is object. Ethics are tangible and/so morality is objective. Keep up lol

Bonks you on the head with a giant cartoon mallet*
And thats the show folks thanks for joining us-
*you lay crumpled and flattened on the ground*

Youre stupid as fuck. Its embarrassing.

Its not my opinion that harm hurts. Thats axiomatic, a term that describes itself. There is no way in the English language to express that idea more succinctly.

Do you understand fundamentally that your personal feelings about doing things actually has zero material effect on the outcome of the thing you did? Like im trying here but its so hard to take people seriously who apparently didnt graduate kindergarten and dont have a functional theory of mind.

Do i really need to explain the reason accelerating a baby into the ground with your leg would be unilaterally harmful to you, the baby, and everyone else around you or associated with the baby? Do i actually need to explain the theory behind this argument to you?

Because its not based on my personal feelings but the material result of the circumstances.... how is this not making sense to you? When i reiterate over and over my personal feelings are irrelevant to the statement, per definition, its not an opinion dipshit.