Hallgeir Sjåstad
banner
hallgeirsjastad.bsky.social
Hallgeir Sjåstad
@hallgeirsjastad.bsky.social
Professor of Psychology & Leadership at Norwegian School of Economics (NHH). I study decision-making, social life, and how people think about the future.

Homepage: https://sites.google.com/view/hallgeir-sjastad/home
For a quick introduction to this research, see the post below.

Full working paper/pre-print:
osf.io/preprints/ps...
June 26, 2025 at 1:39 PM
Pre-print:
osf.io/preprints/ps...

Abstract and key figure summarizing the main effect across our three experiments: See below.

As always: Feedback is most welcome.
June 25, 2025 at 1:57 PM
Abstract: See below.

Working paper/pre-print:
papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....

As always:
Feedback is most welcome!
June 12, 2025 at 5:39 PM
In future work, we recommend that psychological research on sustainability & climate change should start paying more attention to actual behavior, including the long-term impact of system-level interventions.

For those interested:

Please see the abstract & link to our WP in the final post.
June 12, 2025 at 5:39 PM
However, in combination, the social norm-nudge seemed to make the climate incentive more acceptable to the public:

We observed no drop in customer satisfaction in the combined condition, unlike the pure incentive condition.
June 12, 2025 at 5:39 PM
Our study (with Mathias Ekström & Kjetil Bjorvatn) is based on a large-scale field experiment in Bergen, following about 2,000 households over two years.

We find a large effect of a small incentive on both the quantity (kg) & quality (correct sorting) of recycling, but no effect of the norm-nudge.
June 12, 2025 at 5:39 PM
Anxiety: What if something incredibly stupid goes wrong?

Curiosity: What will we find? What will the data look like? What can we learn from it? Will this be interesting for other people too? etc.
May 15, 2025 at 8:17 AM
Even the weather played along! Spring in Bergen 🌞
May 12, 2025 at 5:57 PM
For those interested in an overview:

1: Social media and morality: An updated review (Van Bavel, Robertson, del Rosario, Rasmussen & Rathje 2024).
www.annualreviews.org/content/jour...

2: The MAD Model of Moral Contagion (Brady, Crockett & Van Bavel, 2020).
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32511060/
May 12, 2025 at 5:52 PM
For those interested:

Some reflections below on the background, idea, and main findings.
April 11, 2025 at 4:06 PM
Relevant work:

-Karmic forecasts: psycnet.apa.org/record/2019-...
-Vicarious optimism: psycnet.apa.org/record/2018-... @mjcrockett.bsky.social
-Self-deceptive happiness judgments: psycnet.apa.org/record/1999-...
-The best-case heuristic:
journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1... @jayvanbavel.bsky.social
journals.sagepub.com
April 11, 2025 at 8:29 AM
Reposted by Hallgeir Sjåstad
By focusing on substantive strategies and actionable guidance, rather than the flashiest new phrase, climate communicators may see greater success mobilizing the public.

It’s not about what we call it, but likely how we encourage people to tackle it. jayvanbavellab.substack.com/p/climate-te...
Climate Terminology Does Not Matter
Our new paper finds that swapping out one climate term for another does not meaningfully change people’s stated commitment to fight climate change
jayvanbavellab.substack.com
April 7, 2025 at 5:47 PM
For those interested: A bit more about the background, general idea, and main findings below.
April 7, 2025 at 10:16 AM