There is a lot of great research in Astrology. Trick is, we are a statistical science so... we need around 500 charts to be able to see any trends. Case studies are fun - but quantitative stats is our litmus test.

Query: is this also true in the southern hemisphere?

You have just outed yourself as a quack scientist. We Scientists are curious, open-minded and we verify everything. I am a research Astrologer, among 5 or 6 other sciences and until you do your own investigation you don't get to call yourself a scientist.

correlationjournal.com/understandin... this is not the thesis but you can likely find it from here

There are a staggering number. You have plainly just decided to have an opinion and done no actual research. Start with 1990 Bruce Scofield PHd dissertation in GEOLOGY (yes another "ology")

Nope. I have a dregree in applied science a masters in psychology and a teaching degree oh yeah and an NCGR4 so top astrology credentials. Been studying this for 40 plus years. It is stats. Or to get fancy a corolational longitudinal study with no causality. What is the basis for your assertion?

Nope. I have a drew in applied science a masters in psychology and a teaching degree oh yeah and an NCGR4 so top astrology credentials. Been studying this for 40 plus years. It is stats. Or to get fancy a coronations longitudinal studyveith no causality. What is the basis for your assertion?

Agreed. Astrology belongs eith the other "ologies" (read:statistical sciences) archaeology paleontology biology meteorology psychology sociology... I could go on.