@hadrian99.bsky.social
This is who Vanity Fair decided to hire? Embarrassing all around.
November 26, 2025 at 10:42 PM
This is who Vanity Fair decided to hire? Embarrassing all around.
Some sort of alien for sure.
November 26, 2025 at 10:28 PM
Some sort of alien for sure.
No one else refers to them as Americans for their nation of citizenship. This has been the case for hundreds of years and no American living had a choice in it which makes your accusation of arrogance and other insults rather ridiculous. But please do continue being an asshole.
November 26, 2025 at 10:27 PM
No one else refers to them as Americans for their nation of citizenship. This has been the case for hundreds of years and no American living had a choice in it which makes your accusation of arrogance and other insults rather ridiculous. But please do continue being an asshole.
The POTUS is an American.
November 26, 2025 at 10:17 PM
The POTUS is an American.
A couple of observations although I don’t really disagree with the overall view conclusion. 1) Trump won decisively despite the fact that Harris raised far more money - funding is overrated given a prevailing narrative 2) A primary was probably the right thing to do had Biden exited early enough.
November 26, 2025 at 4:44 PM
A couple of observations although I don’t really disagree with the overall view conclusion. 1) Trump won decisively despite the fact that Harris raised far more money - funding is overrated given a prevailing narrative 2) A primary was probably the right thing to do had Biden exited early enough.
I regret to inform you that people feel housing insecurity all across the country.
November 26, 2025 at 12:30 AM
I regret to inform you that people feel housing insecurity all across the country.
The NYT is Vichy press and a trash newspaper on its best day.
November 24, 2025 at 10:00 PM
The NYT is Vichy press and a trash newspaper on its best day.
The word for what’s going on here is “security”. How secure does a two income family making under 150k feel? Results may vary.
November 24, 2025 at 6:11 PM
The word for what’s going on here is “security”. How secure does a two income family making under 150k feel? Results may vary.
And yet Dems did this very thing you are criticizing here twice knowing full well Republicans were never going to vote to convict. And it was the right thing to do and virtually zero Democratic voters are upset that they couldn’t deliver a conviction and removal. They are aware of the Senate.
November 24, 2025 at 6:07 PM
And yet Dems did this very thing you are criticizing here twice knowing full well Republicans were never going to vote to convict. And it was the right thing to do and virtually zero Democratic voters are upset that they couldn’t deliver a conviction and removal. They are aware of the Senate.
These publications are trash.
November 24, 2025 at 4:50 PM
These publications are trash.
Again, Dems did it twice already. I don’t buy the dramatics around a bit of congressional theater.
November 24, 2025 at 4:18 PM
Again, Dems did it twice already. I don’t buy the dramatics around a bit of congressional theater.
I think the candidate knows full well Dems are in the minority and that this is aimed at Dems who want to see people “fight” a little harder. It’s kinda irrelevant what you think about her campaign tactics. She’s doing it regardless. We’ll see if it works.
November 24, 2025 at 4:17 PM
I think the candidate knows full well Dems are in the minority and that this is aimed at Dems who want to see people “fight” a little harder. It’s kinda irrelevant what you think about her campaign tactics. She’s doing it regardless. We’ll see if it works.
These things are not mutually exclusive.
November 24, 2025 at 4:10 PM
These things are not mutually exclusive.
It’s not meaningless because Trump has committed even worse impeachable actions in his second term and history should record that. It’s also not meaningless because it’s being used here as a campaign tactic and you are responding to it. There is absolutely zero cost to campaigning on impeachment.
November 24, 2025 at 4:09 PM
It’s not meaningless because Trump has committed even worse impeachable actions in his second term and history should record that. It’s also not meaningless because it’s being used here as a campaign tactic and you are responding to it. There is absolutely zero cost to campaigning on impeachment.
Yes, exactly. And if you can do multiple impeachments efforts then you can do another as well even if it’s for messaging. It’s not like it’s unwarranted.
November 24, 2025 at 3:58 PM
Yes, exactly. And if you can do multiple impeachments efforts then you can do another as well even if it’s for messaging. It’s not like it’s unwarranted.
Weird how this argument didn’t keep Democrats from trying to impeach Trump twice. I guess that messaging and political narrative making was different from this one though.
November 24, 2025 at 3:31 PM
Weird how this argument didn’t keep Democrats from trying to impeach Trump twice. I guess that messaging and political narrative making was different from this one though.
Who cares? The Republicans voted to get rid of ACA like 40 times. They held countless hearings on Benghazi. Messaging is effective. That’s why you’re complaining about it.
November 24, 2025 at 2:53 PM
Who cares? The Republicans voted to get rid of ACA like 40 times. They held countless hearings on Benghazi. Messaging is effective. That’s why you’re complaining about it.
Daniel Biss, for example, could come out for impeachment and lose no votes while likely gaining some. You guys are trying to equate impeachment to passing M4A and it’s a dumb argument because the point is not that impeachment is actually possible.
November 24, 2025 at 2:50 PM
Daniel Biss, for example, could come out for impeachment and lose no votes while likely gaining some. You guys are trying to equate impeachment to passing M4A and it’s a dumb argument because the point is not that impeachment is actually possible.
If incumbent Dems are too weak to message impeachment against a horribly corrupt and criminal President then yes, they deserve to be defeated in a primary race.
November 24, 2025 at 2:44 PM
If incumbent Dems are too weak to message impeachment against a horribly corrupt and criminal President then yes, they deserve to be defeated in a primary race.
Dems tried to do it twice so let’s not pretend it’s some radical campaign strategy. You don’t like the fact that there’s a good number of people in her district and nationwide who will react positively to this.
November 24, 2025 at 1:09 PM
Dems tried to do it twice so let’s not pretend it’s some radical campaign strategy. You don’t like the fact that there’s a good number of people in her district and nationwide who will react positively to this.
For a very smart guy, you’ve gotten tripped up over being right about a couple things, in general, as opposed to utilizing winning political narratives for the benefit of the greater good.
November 21, 2025 at 8:42 PM
For a very smart guy, you’ve gotten tripped up over being right about a couple things, in general, as opposed to utilizing winning political narratives for the benefit of the greater good.
Their headline just echoes Trump’s attack on Democrats. Truly a trash newspaper.
November 21, 2025 at 2:31 PM
Their headline just echoes Trump’s attack on Democrats. Truly a trash newspaper.
David, you just might be too online these days if you’re inundated with leftist slogans.
November 15, 2025 at 10:15 PM
David, you just might be too online these days if you’re inundated with leftist slogans.
There’s a lot of elected Dems and consultants who think their hands are too pure to dirty with Epstein politics. Too crass for them.
November 15, 2025 at 9:57 PM
There’s a lot of elected Dems and consultants who think their hands are too pure to dirty with Epstein politics. Too crass for them.
Remember that these headlines are an intentional choice. Here the NYT is essentially blaming the victim.
November 14, 2025 at 2:03 AM
Remember that these headlines are an intentional choice. Here the NYT is essentially blaming the victim.