A move on Greenland wouldn’t expand U.S. power — it would collapse it.
A move on Greenland wouldn’t expand U.S. power — it would collapse it.
It would isolate Washington, empower Moscow and Beijing, and end 75 years of Western security architecture.
It would isolate Washington, empower Moscow and Beijing, and end 75 years of Western security architecture.
– supply chain disruption
– millions of U.S. jobs at risk
– downward pressure on the dollar
– higher U.S. inflation
This is not a cost‑free scenario.
– supply chain disruption
– millions of U.S. jobs at risk
– downward pressure on the dollar
– higher U.S. inflation
This is not a cost‑free scenario.
These aren’t symbolic outposts — they’re the hubs for U.S. operations in the Middle East, Africa, and Central Asia.
Losing them would cripple U.S. global reach.
These aren’t symbolic outposts — they’re the hubs for U.S. operations in the Middle East, Africa, and Central Asia.
Losing them would cripple U.S. global reach.
A U.S. move against it = aggression against a NATO member.
That breaks the core rule of the alliance: allies don’t invade allies.
A U.S. move against it = aggression against a NATO member.
That breaks the core rule of the alliance: allies don’t invade allies.