Gurpreet kaur
@gurpreetkaur5.bsky.social
Yes, they should be protected, because exposing potential harm to civil-rights enforcement serves the public interest, even when it challenges those in power. Without strong protections, employees may stay silent, allowing unlawful or unethical practices to continue.
#UCWCLST204
#UCWCLST204
January 19, 2026 at 4:35 AM
Yes, they should be protected, because exposing potential harm to civil-rights enforcement serves the public interest, even when it challenges those in power. Without strong protections, employees may stay silent, allowing unlawful or unethical practices to continue.
#UCWCLST204
#UCWCLST204
I believe yes, they should be protected, because harm to civil-rights enforcement serves the public interest, even when it challenges those in power. Without strong protections, employees may stay silent, allowing unlawful or unethical practices to continue.
#UCWCLST204
#UCWCLST204
January 19, 2026 at 2:58 AM
I believe yes, they should be protected, because harm to civil-rights enforcement serves the public interest, even when it challenges those in power. Without strong protections, employees may stay silent, allowing unlawful or unethical practices to continue.
#UCWCLST204
#UCWCLST204
Should the firing of HUD fair-housing lawyers who raised concerns about discrimination be seen as justified management action or as retaliation that undermines civil-rights enforcement?
January 19, 2026 at 2:50 AM
Should the firing of HUD fair-housing lawyers who raised concerns about discrimination be seen as justified management action or as retaliation that undermines civil-rights enforcement?