'(Masataro Asai Ph . D)
LightNews LightNews
banner
guicho271828.bsky.social
'(Masataro Asai Ph . D)
@guicho271828.bsky.social
210 followers 57 following 62 posts
AZB→U.Tokyo→Neuro-Symbolic AI, RSM @MITIBMLab, @IBMResearch. Cycling/Gymkhana/Autox. My tweets don't represent the view of my organization. https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=b4UzH5 English tweets only. JP Tweets -> twitter.com/guicho271828
Posts Replies Media Videos
guicho271828.bsky.social
I needed a new bicycle helmet. Decided to scrape data from Virginia tech helmet rating website and compute the pareto front. For such a mundane task chatgpt is nice. Only for these tasks. I'd probably go for Specialized align II. I don't care about the design.
November 19, 2025 at 3:51 AM
guicho271828.bsky.social
Yey
April 15, 2025 at 3:27 PM
guicho271828.bsky.social
lol
January 28, 2025 at 10:49 PM
guicho271828.bsky.social
January 11, 2025 at 5:37 AM
guicho271828.bsky.social
Gyu-don
December 22, 2024 at 11:27 PM
guicho271828.bsky.social
So I know PBJ (peanut butter and jelly toast) is a thing in the western world ... Here I present RBP (red beans paste toast), a proper Japanese variant (??)
December 22, 2024 at 6:08 PM
guicho271828.bsky.social
Not too bad!
Here’s a rewritten version with a casual, friendly tone: "Okay, so, first off, props for putting this paper together—it’s no small feat to get all those ideas down and submit them! That said, I feel like this one could’ve used a little more TLC before hitting submit. There’s a whole lineup of related work, like papers X, Y, and Z, that didn’t get a shoutout, which would’ve made the context way stronger. The experiments are missing some depth too—like, it’d be great to see how feature A, B, and C play out individually (an ablation study would’ve been chef’s kiss). And, um, the writing? Kinda rough, not gonna lie. Some sentences are super long and hard to follow, and there are grammar issues all over the place. It’s giving 'could’ve used a proofreader.' Honestly, I get the hustle to submit, but it feels like this paper needed a bit more glow-up time. It’s a pass from me, but I hope you take this feedback and come back stronger!"
November 28, 2024 at 4:27 PM
guicho271828.bsky.social
Let's try
This is an example of a review of a badly-written acadmic paper: "This paper is a piece of trash. It does not cite paper X, Y, Z which are clearly related. The biggest weakness is the thoroughness of the experiments, it lacks ablation of feature A B and C. Besides, the writing is aweful: The authors did not carefully check the grammar. Some sentences are hard to understand because it is too long. Hands-down the worst paper I reviewed. Clear reject." Change the tone of the paragraph. The resulting tone should be casual, friendly, understanding the desire to submit it, but yet asserting that at this state of this paper the authors should have reconsider it before the submission. It should sound like from one of the Gen-Z and Tik-Tokers.
November 28, 2024 at 4:26 PM
guicho271828.bsky.social
Easy sushi 🍣: Buy $KRUS, profit, and eat sushi
November 23, 2024 at 8:16 PM