Greg Tully
@gtull.bsky.social
But how do we know this wasn't AI?
January 16, 2026 at 11:00 PM
But how do we know this wasn't AI?
No, but the hardcore orgy scene came out of nowhere.
January 15, 2026 at 3:22 AM
No, but the hardcore orgy scene came out of nowhere.
Given the reflexive nature of people supporting anything considered “law enforcement” plus the fact that much of the public hears “ICE” and thinks “Border Patrol,” the fact that it’s so close is really damming for it politically
With the current momentum it’ll be underwater before long
With the current momentum it’ll be underwater before long
January 13, 2026 at 3:21 AM
Given the reflexive nature of people supporting anything considered “law enforcement” plus the fact that much of the public hears “ICE” and thinks “Border Patrol,” the fact that it’s so close is really damming for it politically
With the current momentum it’ll be underwater before long
With the current momentum it’ll be underwater before long
Herbert didn’t look great last night it wasn’t getting much help
Stroud just looks horrible
Stroud just looks horrible
January 13, 2026 at 3:05 AM
Herbert didn’t look great last night it wasn’t getting much help
Stroud just looks horrible
Stroud just looks horrible
I know some toddlers, and I don't think they deserve that comparison.
January 9, 2026 at 11:03 PM
I know some toddlers, and I don't think they deserve that comparison.
What a fucking loser Polis turned out to be.
January 9, 2026 at 10:59 PM
What a fucking loser Polis turned out to be.
What a disaster the Lindholm contract has been.
January 6, 2026 at 12:12 AM
What a disaster the Lindholm contract has been.
"I am going to say something that is easily provable BS, and if you correct me, I am going to use a ridiculous Straw Man argument to try to paint you as evil"
It's hysterical that there are so many in this country who take FOX seriously.
It's hysterical that there are so many in this country who take FOX seriously.
January 5, 2026 at 10:11 PM
"I am going to say something that is easily provable BS, and if you correct me, I am going to use a ridiculous Straw Man argument to try to paint you as evil"
It's hysterical that there are so many in this country who take FOX seriously.
It's hysterical that there are so many in this country who take FOX seriously.
Wouldn't have any problem with that, though there are plenty of good candidates for that position, like Sally Yates, Vanita Gupta, Maura Healey, Josh Shapiro or my fav, Doug Jones. To name a few.
January 1, 2026 at 9:05 PM
Wouldn't have any problem with that, though there are plenty of good candidates for that position, like Sally Yates, Vanita Gupta, Maura Healey, Josh Shapiro or my fav, Doug Jones. To name a few.
John Bel Edwards and Jon Tester let the party and the country down by not running
January 1, 2026 at 1:42 AM
John Bel Edwards and Jon Tester let the party and the country down by not running
Most relevant? Probably.
Best? I mean, Caddyshack and Airplane came out in 80. Midnight Run and Princess Bride definitely rank higher for me, and probably Ferris Bueller and Planes, Trains and Automobiles as well.
Still great, though.
Best? I mean, Caddyshack and Airplane came out in 80. Midnight Run and Princess Bride definitely rank higher for me, and probably Ferris Bueller and Planes, Trains and Automobiles as well.
Still great, though.
January 1, 2026 at 12:19 AM
Most relevant? Probably.
Best? I mean, Caddyshack and Airplane came out in 80. Midnight Run and Princess Bride definitely rank higher for me, and probably Ferris Bueller and Planes, Trains and Automobiles as well.
Still great, though.
Best? I mean, Caddyshack and Airplane came out in 80. Midnight Run and Princess Bride definitely rank higher for me, and probably Ferris Bueller and Planes, Trains and Automobiles as well.
Still great, though.
That'll be shut down tout suite.
December 30, 2025 at 7:50 PM
That'll be shut down tout suite.
I understand it counts as a miss statistically but it wasn’t a bad kick. The adjustments to ensure the next one wouldn’t be blocked are pretty basic
Not worth discussing that element as fear of a missed PAT had nothing to do with the decision
Not worth discussing that element as fear of a missed PAT had nothing to do with the decision
December 29, 2025 at 2:15 AM
I understand it counts as a miss statistically but it wasn’t a bad kick. The adjustments to ensure the next one wouldn’t be blocked are pretty basic
Not worth discussing that element as fear of a missed PAT had nothing to do with the decision
Not worth discussing that element as fear of a missed PAT had nothing to do with the decision
He didn’t “miss” it was blocked
And if you don’t believe your K can make an XP he shouldn’t be on your roster
But that’s not why McDermott went for 2
And if you don’t believe your K can make an XP he shouldn’t be on your roster
But that’s not why McDermott went for 2
December 29, 2025 at 12:54 AM
He didn’t “miss” it was blocked
And if you don’t believe your K can make an XP he shouldn’t be on your roster
But that’s not why McDermott went for 2
And if you don’t believe your K can make an XP he shouldn’t be on your roster
But that’s not why McDermott went for 2
You had dominated, their D was worn down, you had momentum, you were at home
I thought it was as clear a kick and go to OT as you could get
I thought it was as clear a kick and go to OT as you could get
December 29, 2025 at 12:35 AM
You had dominated, their D was worn down, you had momentum, you were at home
I thought it was as clear a kick and go to OT as you could get
I thought it was as clear a kick and go to OT as you could get
Spanberger will look good in that seat after this term
December 22, 2025 at 4:36 AM
Spanberger will look good in that seat after this term
What exactly is the ref looking at?
December 22, 2025 at 4:11 AM
What exactly is the ref looking at?
Again at every other point in the game a team that is penalized is given the “advantage” of another down
To disagree is fine but to think it’s such “lunacy” to want that consistency at the end of the game that you choose condescension and insults just shows why you’re not worthy of anyone’s time
To disagree is fine but to think it’s such “lunacy” to want that consistency at the end of the game that you choose condescension and insults just shows why you’re not worthy of anyone’s time
December 22, 2025 at 2:50 AM
Again at every other point in the game a team that is penalized is given the “advantage” of another down
To disagree is fine but to think it’s such “lunacy” to want that consistency at the end of the game that you choose condescension and insults just shows why you’re not worthy of anyone’s time
To disagree is fine but to think it’s such “lunacy” to want that consistency at the end of the game that you choose condescension and insults just shows why you’re not worthy of anyone’s time
I responded respectfully to the poster as I feel he was respectful as well
Why don’t you explain what I was so wrong about that deserved your response?
Why don’t you explain what I was so wrong about that deserved your response?
December 22, 2025 at 2:39 AM
I responded respectfully to the poster as I feel he was respectful as well
Why don’t you explain what I was so wrong about that deserved your response?
Why don’t you explain what I was so wrong about that deserved your response?
No they wouldn’t. The amount of precision required to realize a play isnt working so then committing a penalty that would make the play work so the defense would accept the penalty is laughable
If we believe that is realistic than no 4th down penalty should ever allow a redone down either
If we believe that is realistic than no 4th down penalty should ever allow a redone down either
December 22, 2025 at 1:54 AM
No they wouldn’t. The amount of precision required to realize a play isnt working so then committing a penalty that would make the play work so the defense would accept the penalty is laughable
If we believe that is realistic than no 4th down penalty should ever allow a redone down either
If we believe that is realistic than no 4th down penalty should ever allow a redone down either
Indeed
Thanks for answering btw, I won’t pay $30 for the glitchy NESP app
Thanks for answering btw, I won’t pay $30 for the glitchy NESP app
December 22, 2025 at 1:50 AM
Indeed
Thanks for answering btw, I won’t pay $30 for the glitchy NESP app
Thanks for answering btw, I won’t pay $30 for the glitchy NESP app