LightNews LightNews
banner
griffdbc.bsky.social
@griffdbc.bsky.social
320 followers 82 following 13 posts
Posts Replies Media Videos
griffdbc.bsky.social
December 27, 2024 at 2:59 AM
griffdbc.bsky.social
December 22, 2024 at 2:01 PM
griffdbc.bsky.social
I
December 22, 2024 at 12:18 PM
griffdbc.bsky.social
Lite work today
December 20, 2024 at 4:01 PM
griffdbc.bsky.social
Me best friend
December 19, 2024 at 12:50 AM
Reposted
mjfree.bsky.social
Thank God Vanity Fair is keeping it REAL!
December 15, 2024 at 9:48 PM
griffdbc.bsky.social
Onlyway
December 16, 2024 at 12:51 AM
Reposted
meidastouch.com
Canadian MP Charlie Angus just sounded off on Trump.

"So yes, they are our neighbors, but we've stood up to them. We're in a different situation with Trump, a convicted predator, who's seriously undermining the democratic process in the US. And he thinks he can just push us around. He insults us."
December 11, 2024 at 8:20 PM
griffdbc.bsky.social
December 12, 2024 at 1:35 AM
Reposted
meidastouch.com
The NY Attorney General has REJECTED Trump's bid to dismiss his $500M civil fraud judgment post-election. The AG stated that Trump's presidency doesn't shield him from civil litigation over non-official conduct, per the Constitution and multiple court precedents.
Dear Mr. Sauer: I am writing in response to your letter dated November 26, 2024, regarding the above-referenced action. This Office will not stipulate to vacate the final judgment already entered by Supreme Court, New York County, in this action or otherwise seek to dismiss the action. As you know, this is a civil enforcement action under Executive Law § 63(12) against the Trump Organization, a business headquartered in New York, and its top executives concerning those defendants' fraudulent and unlawful actions to misleadingly inflate defendant Donald J. Trump's personal net worth in business transactions for the purpose of obtaining more favorable terms on loans and insurance policies than they otherwise would have received. This civil enforcement action was filed following a multiyear investigation by the Office, and multiple courts have rejected claims that the investigation or action were brought in anything other than good faith. See People v. Trump Org., Inc., 205 A.D.3d 625, 626-27 (1st Dep't 2022); Trump v. James, No. 1:21-1352, 2022 WL 1718951, at *12-14 (N.D.N.Y. May 27, 2022). Following summary judgment and an eleven-week bench trial, Supreme Court concluded that Mr. Trump and the other entity and individual defendants violated § 63(12). The court also entered final judgment ordering various forms of equitable relief. Defendants appealed from Supreme Court's post-trial final judgment. That appeal has been fully briefed and argued in the Appellate Division, First Department, and the parties are now awaiting a decision from the First Department. Your letter presents no basis for this Office to seek to vacate the final judgment or to dismiss this action. First, Mr. Trump's upcoming inauguration as the next President of the United States has no bearing on the pendency of defendants' appeal in this action. This civil enforcement action is not a criminal action, and Supreme Court did not impose any criminal sanction on Mr. Trump or any other defendant. Accordingly, the various actions taken by the Special Counsel's office or the District Attorney's Office of New York County in the respective criminal cases brought by those offices against Mr. Trump are irrelevant here. Contrary to your suggestion, the pendency of defendants' appeal during Mr. Trump's term as President fully comports with the U.S. Constitution. The final judgment concerns only business conduct undertaken by entities that are part of the Trump Organization and individual defendants who were acting on behalf of the Trump Organization. The judgment thus does not concern any conduct related to Mr. Trump's first term as President. Nor does it implicate any conduct that Mr. Trump might undertake after his upcoming inauguration. Presidents do not have immunity from civil lawsuits arising from unofficial conduct, and such lawsuits may proceed while the President is in office. See Clinton v. Jones, 520 U.S. 681, 694 (1997); Zervos v. Trump, 171 A.D.3d 110, 128 (1st Dep't 2019); see also Trump v. United States, 603 U.S. 593, 615-16 (2024). Regardless, Mr. Trump's upcoming inauguration is irrelevant to the judgment rendered against the fourteen other defendants found liable by Supreme Court in this action. There is also no merit to your claim that the pendency of defendants' own appeal will impede Mr. Trump's official duties as President. The ordinary burdens of civil litigation do not impede the President's official duties in a way that violates the U.S. Constitution. See Clinton, 520 U.S. at 705-06; Zervos, 171 A.D.3d at 125-26. In any event, Mr. Trump does not face any such litigation burdens here. The trial is over, final judgment has been rendered, and defendants' appeal to the First Department has been fully submitted and argued. Mr. Trump's official duties will not be impeded while awaiting the First Department's decision. Nor wi…
December 10, 2024 at 5:20 PM
griffdbc.bsky.social
December 9, 2024 at 1:07 PM
griffdbc.bsky.social
Check ur coverage
December 6, 2024 at 2:06 PM
griffdbc.bsky.social
December 4, 2024 at 1:23 AM
Reposted
tify330.bsky.social
Sad I had break up with Gavin today just like him this heaux ain’t loyal 😂 I will find a new boo.
December 3, 2024 at 11:39 PM
Reposted
korbelrenokia.bsky.social
December 1, 2024 at 9:04 PM
Reposted
magatrigger.bsky.social
If you are an account with under 3000 followers my DM's are open and I am currently putting together a list for all of you but I need your help.

Drop you @ and dm me to be added.
November 29, 2024 at 5:21 PM