As a lay listener of Div Arg. I compliment @williambaude.bluesky.social for rigor. He distinguishes himself, however, for his deference to the Court’s motives. He omits any consideration of the implications of the Court’s impact on the lived experiences of the very people Law is intended to serve.

I don’t have any suggestions but I mostly use threads and as far as I can tell I am not served up any of your posts for about the last 6 weeks. Seems strange since I used to see everything.

I am really glad you were able to sit down with Baude who I like but is also insufferably dedicated to rationalizing the SC’s absurdities. My one critique is that I can’t believe you gave the SC a C-? I doubt you would have done the same on your podcast.

What in the living hell are you doing meeting with Marc Andreessen? Read the gd room, Senator!