Great shot @garymundy99.bsky.social. Was just listening to Hand of Glory. That album sure did see a lot of releases. Three copies of the 7" 1983 version on Discogs, it's pretty tempting. I am still after S.P.I.T.E. as well, someday for sure.

Hey Jim! Yes, that is definitely unintended if the reader finds that meaning. One could say that and they would be right, I had thought I had addressed that. Next time if I had not. From another perspective in complexity science you can have large islands of order amongst disorder. Thanks!

I recommend Heidegger and Maturana's works, where they discuss things/objects. Thanks.

There is no way for a primordial, objective, "true," world to communicate itself to the nervous system because the nervous system is perception. Constitutive over transcedental ontology. The nervous sys. is self-referential, but it can still be perturbed by stimuli, but these are not inputs.

The second implication is that humans are not receiving "objective" information from the world processed into representations of it, but the nervous system decides on its own behalf how to respond to a changing world, largely through sensorimotor correlations.

The first implication is that the world is neither objective/subjective because the nervous system, in its state when it encounters a stimulus, brings it forth through the state it is in. It is not a model (not found in the literature), but what counts as (reality) is inseparable from the perceiver.

That is a fair question. A stimulus perturbs a sensory surface - it's a disruption or a disturbance. I agree it sends something to the sensory surface; however, the perturbation does not determine the nervous system's reaction to the disruption; the nervous system does on its own, making it closed.

That is awesome! I wish I could speak Spanish. Perhaps I ought to learn so I can read more of Maturana's works. You will have to keep us all updated on your findings.