@gregpbates.bsky.social
Pay down the debt with it.
February 22, 2025 at 4:17 PM
Pay down the debt with it.
Off with his head!
February 22, 2025 at 4:12 PM
Off with his head!
No doubt they are in it to take over.
February 22, 2025 at 4:11 PM
No doubt they are in it to take over.
How about project 2027!
February 11, 2025 at 12:19 AM
How about project 2027!
We need to get this bumped up to MILLIONS.
February 6, 2025 at 2:05 PM
We need to get this bumped up to MILLIONS.
It will be interesting to see the cost per removal. And how the budget deficit is affected in the first quarter.
February 1, 2025 at 4:57 PM
It will be interesting to see the cost per removal. And how the budget deficit is affected in the first quarter.
What the fuck is he trying to prove?
February 1, 2025 at 4:55 PM
What the fuck is he trying to prove?
THIS CANNOT BE A SURPRISE TO ANYONE. CAN IT?
February 1, 2025 at 3:18 AM
THIS CANNOT BE A SURPRISE TO ANYONE. CAN IT?
He is nobody without Trump. And he knows it.
January 28, 2025 at 5:19 PM
He is nobody without Trump. And he knows it.
He gained nothing using the threat of tariffs against Columbia.
January 28, 2025 at 3:37 PM
He gained nothing using the threat of tariffs against Columbia.
TO HIM EVERYTHING IS A ZERO SUM GAME.
January 28, 2025 at 3:34 PM
TO HIM EVERYTHING IS A ZERO SUM GAME.
TRUMPONOMICS!
January 28, 2025 at 12:35 PM
TRUMPONOMICS!
It's a slippery slope. I dont recommend it.
January 27, 2025 at 9:43 PM
It's a slippery slope. I dont recommend it.
Because we don't have the votes to get anything without bipartisanship.
BTW Generally Congress is not going call for civil disobedience. That needs to come from the people and their organizations.
BTW Generally Congress is not going call for civil disobedience. That needs to come from the people and their organizations.
January 27, 2025 at 9:39 PM
Because we don't have the votes to get anything without bipartisanship.
BTW Generally Congress is not going call for civil disobedience. That needs to come from the people and their organizations.
BTW Generally Congress is not going call for civil disobedience. That needs to come from the people and their organizations.
They think it is going to be simple. It is not.
Today, a Reagan appointed federal judge in Washington ruled against Trump's attempted end to birthright citizenship.
Today, a Reagan appointed federal judge in Washington ruled against Trump's attempted end to birthright citizenship.
January 23, 2025 at 11:33 PM
They think it is going to be simple. It is not.
Today, a Reagan appointed federal judge in Washington ruled against Trump's attempted end to birthright citizenship.
Today, a Reagan appointed federal judge in Washington ruled against Trump's attempted end to birthright citizenship.
Reposted
The Times is wrong. We do have a king in America. He is above all law, and his whim is instant law. Further this king can direct anyone of his followers to commit a crime and be pardoned by his Excellency. Any government secret he can reveal because his thought alone determines what is revealed.
January 22, 2025 at 9:45 PM
The Times is wrong. We do have a king in America. He is above all law, and his whim is instant law. Further this king can direct anyone of his followers to commit a crime and be pardoned by his Excellency. Any government secret he can reveal because his thought alone determines what is revealed.
He doesn't care about that pesky constitution! So we have to make sure he doesn't break it.
January 20, 2025 at 6:41 PM
He doesn't care about that pesky constitution! So we have to make sure he doesn't break it.
Birthright citizenship is derived from the constitution. I don't think he will be able to change it with an executive order.
January 20, 2025 at 6:40 PM
Birthright citizenship is derived from the constitution. I don't think he will be able to change it with an executive order.