Adopted pursuant to the City of Toronto Act, this seems like collateral damage from debate over the use of green standards applied through other planning powers. Who specifically lobbied for this? Used for +15 years,well priced in, guess you never waste a good crisis, but feels like looting.

I sent you a DM on this platform

Instead of “annex”, a more accurate quote reference from your President would be to “economic(ally) force” Canada - a decidedly less neighbourly foreign policy position than what annex might be read to imply

Would be interesting to see performance metric of land area by height permissions (as a housing density surrogate) for large and medium NA cities - would expect inner cities (Cambridge) of city regions (Boston Metro) to show higher “performance” by default given comparably smaller land area

And the Raps won !