Therefore, a NO supplement might benefit long term THC users, both on the medical and the recreational side.

Plain English for those like me - Endothelial dysfunction occurs when there isn't enough nitric oxide (NO) inside your blood vessel walls. Your endothelium itself makes NO, which acts as a vasodilator, opening up your blood vessels for your blood to flow freely.

Bro just shut the fuck up. You claim your firm was shut down because of the lab leak in your profile. You’re obviously insane.

Not at all. I already provided peer reviewed articles on what the scientific community thinks is the origin

Both of them had low confidence is their findings. Why are you taking them at face value? I would suggest reading the 520 report and not summaries.

Lmao ok dude. Learn how to spell and type first and then we can argue.

No he didn’t lol and you can certainly use it at school. But instead of linking Wikipedia you link the peer review articles at the end. You’d know that if you attended school buddy 😊

I provided you multiple links and peer reviewed articles proving it’s not a lab leak. I’m not sure how much closer I can get you to understand and shed the propaganda you’ve been fed

I guess I have to ask. Do you have any qualifications? Cause everything you’re saying sounds dumb as shit.

I also feel Wikipedia in this circumstance does a pretty wonderful summarizing both sides with good articles:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COVID-1...

Just reviewed his stuff, interesting items. However, he suggests there’s no direct animal link that can harbor the virus, which seems as an intentional oversight for someone at that level:

www.science.org/doi/10.1126/...

www.science.org/doi/10.1126/...

Do you mean Dr. Ralph Baric? If so, then yes

Sorry I had to cut some words to match the letter count. But you can look the exact wording if needed in the 520 report. I will review the fees you mentioned and will comment back

“In February/March of 23, DOE and FBI publicly acknowledged their respective assessments that COVID19 was the likely result of a lab incident: FBI with moderate confidence and DOE with low confidence. Other intelligence elements assess COVID19 emergence was likely zoonotic, albeit all with low conf”

I don’t consider a twitter feed real data but I’ll absolutely look into and respond. However, directly from the 520 page report:

It is becoming scarier than normal. They are now using this unscientific report and its findings as a fundamental belief on how to approach future pandemics. Bird flu is around the corner and I can’t even get my hands on the data since President Trump stopped inter-agency communications.

It was absolutely incorrect since the findings don’t match the results, based on my evaluation. The findings and conclusion is miles apart on the 520 page report.

Do you have any other sources that I can review that prove there’s no direct link to a zoonotic transfer but rather a lab release?

Here is the 520 page House investigation report for anyone that likes to punish themselves like I do:

oversight.house.gov/release/fina...