Graham Kekule
@grahamkekule.bsky.social
Why is it dangerous?
November 27, 2025 at 4:16 PM
Why is it dangerous?
Being a noncombatant civilian in a location where the US military and/or police are operating is the best excuse possible to own body armor.
November 3, 2025 at 7:44 PM
Being a noncombatant civilian in a location where the US military and/or police are operating is the best excuse possible to own body armor.
September 3, 2025 at 5:09 PM
Doesn't seem like it...
August 27, 2025 at 8:24 PM
Doesn't seem like it...
Your antigun agenda is the weakest it has been in 100 yrs
August 20, 2025 at 5:41 PM
Your antigun agenda is the weakest it has been in 100 yrs
Why are you lying?
Anyways, take this L from an obama appointed judge today on the issue:
Anyways, take this L from an obama appointed judge today on the issue:
August 20, 2025 at 5:26 PM
Why are you lying?
Anyways, take this L from an obama appointed judge today on the issue:
Anyways, take this L from an obama appointed judge today on the issue:
From what you linked:
June 18, 2025 at 11:57 PM
From what you linked:
Then why was this wording used in the Pennsylvania Declaration of Rights in 1776? The fun thing about your theory relying on "corpus linguistics" is that it mat be easily debunked with only a few prominent counterexamples.
June 5, 2025 at 11:05 PM
Then why was this wording used in the Pennsylvania Declaration of Rights in 1776? The fun thing about your theory relying on "corpus linguistics" is that it mat be easily debunked with only a few prominent counterexamples.
Why would it be incorrect? What insights into alternative interpretations do you have to inform you?
Here's case law from Tennessee about the same concept, from 1840.
Here's case law from Tennessee about the same concept, from 1840.
June 5, 2025 at 12:13 AM
Why would it be incorrect? What insights into alternative interpretations do you have to inform you?
Here's case law from Tennessee about the same concept, from 1840.
Here's case law from Tennessee about the same concept, from 1840.
This was a mainstream opinion (Cooley was Chief Justice of the Michigan supreme court and President of the ABA) in 1898.
Perhaps you're the one who bought into a lie.
Perhaps you're the one who bought into a lie.
June 4, 2025 at 4:46 PM
This was a mainstream opinion (Cooley was Chief Justice of the Michigan supreme court and President of the ABA) in 1898.
Perhaps you're the one who bought into a lie.
Perhaps you're the one who bought into a lie.
For the time being.
Big case in the works at scotus rn!
Big case in the works at scotus rn!
May 18, 2025 at 6:18 PM
For the time being.
Big case in the works at scotus rn!
Big case in the works at scotus rn!
I noticed you missed that on February 4, 1889, Idaho's territorial legislature banned concealed carry in towns.
Was this just overlooked or an intentional omission given that the Idaho Supreme Court overturned the law in 1902 citing the 2nd amendment?
Was this just overlooked or an intentional omission given that the Idaho Supreme Court overturned the law in 1902 citing the 2nd amendment?
May 14, 2025 at 3:38 PM
I noticed you missed that on February 4, 1889, Idaho's territorial legislature banned concealed carry in towns.
Was this just overlooked or an intentional omission given that the Idaho Supreme Court overturned the law in 1902 citing the 2nd amendment?
Was this just overlooked or an intentional omission given that the Idaho Supreme Court overturned the law in 1902 citing the 2nd amendment?
