The easiest explanation is that the more familiar you are with the medium, the more your brain breaks it down and digests its actual component parts, as opposed to only watching the intended focus. The AI is basically just averaging all its source material so it's good at mimicking the focus points.

Yes, familiarity with videography/photography/cinematography makes it easier to spot. For now.

This is as accessible a primer as I've seen.

youtu.be/M4TXO4kQwSQ

Agreed. It doesn't plot easily onto the standard adjective rubric. If you look at the cambridge dictionary example, it's fairly clear that "nude" would be "physical quality," But "muscular" could be "size," "shape," or "physical quality"

Was he a nude man who happened to be muscular, or vice versa?

I should open a souvenir stand next to my instant pot. I'd make a killing.

UPDATE TO THE UPDATE: It's back

Incredibly motivating side-eye, if I do say so myself

Canadian Op-Eds: How to maximize the Winnipeg winter walkway system's war effectiveness during guerilla actions...

UPDATE: It has been replaced with some other, less hilarious Tesla. Well done, neighbour with a printer.

What do all those dials even do??

You're an essential service around here

Everyone is Canadian while watching a Don McKellar movie. It's in our Charter of Rights.

Somewhere out there, moonwalk ewok is looking up at the same stars as you

I'm taking this as a positive review

"... And that's how irresponsibly using your massive media platform can cause serious real world harm. And now, ads:"

"Listen to the Nacy Grace Podcast on I Heart Radio!"

Not QUITE Raytheon, but pretty good!