gr1mer
@gr1mer.bsky.social
I like that he tried to copy her use of the tilde, instead of just using a hyphen like everyone else does when crediting a quote.
He wanted to use the smart squiggle too.
He wanted to use the smart squiggle too.
November 21, 2025 at 11:46 PM
I like that he tried to copy her use of the tilde, instead of just using a hyphen like everyone else does when crediting a quote.
He wanted to use the smart squiggle too.
He wanted to use the smart squiggle too.
This is the shit. Nice job.
October 27, 2025 at 6:02 PM
This is the shit. Nice job.
Not a single matching vest. No way that any of the gear is government issued.
June 21, 2025 at 1:44 PM
Not a single matching vest. No way that any of the gear is government issued.
These are the same people who say that "making unhealthy choices" puts extra strain on the medical system. They said it was a patriotic duty to be healthy.
Does having to treat measles outbreaks not put more strain on the healthcare system than say... A vaccine?
Does having to treat measles outbreaks not put more strain on the healthcare system than say... A vaccine?
May 12, 2025 at 3:03 AM
These are the same people who say that "making unhealthy choices" puts extra strain on the medical system. They said it was a patriotic duty to be healthy.
Does having to treat measles outbreaks not put more strain on the healthcare system than say... A vaccine?
Does having to treat measles outbreaks not put more strain on the healthcare system than say... A vaccine?
Is there a way to mute shitty JPEGs with words on em?
April 5, 2025 at 12:05 PM
Is there a way to mute shitty JPEGs with words on em?
"But you can make yourself orange"
March 26, 2025 at 7:52 PM
"But you can make yourself orange"
I really don't think the label of "domestic terrorists" fits. Maybe "friendly people" would be better?
March 23, 2025 at 10:34 PM
I really don't think the label of "domestic terrorists" fits. Maybe "friendly people" would be better?
As much as I don't want to give it viewership, I often find that when people reflexively discredit "leftist media" (i.e. any reputable news source) showing them the wacko personalities they are supporting is a powerful tool.
Would you mind telling me which podcast had this pair on?
Would you mind telling me which podcast had this pair on?
March 18, 2025 at 5:29 PM
As much as I don't want to give it viewership, I often find that when people reflexively discredit "leftist media" (i.e. any reputable news source) showing them the wacko personalities they are supporting is a powerful tool.
Would you mind telling me which podcast had this pair on?
Would you mind telling me which podcast had this pair on?
Amazing replies. Amazing work.
March 10, 2025 at 12:35 AM
Amazing replies. Amazing work.
This is absolutely the wrong take. Don't get taken advantage of. Don't let the door to abuse open wider.
March 7, 2025 at 12:54 AM
This is absolutely the wrong take. Don't get taken advantage of. Don't let the door to abuse open wider.
What kind of ticker message is:
"Europe Plots to Stop Trump From Taking Greenland"
Holy hell.
"Europe Plots to Stop Trump From Taking Greenland"
Holy hell.
January 30, 2025 at 4:15 AM
What kind of ticker message is:
"Europe Plots to Stop Trump From Taking Greenland"
Holy hell.
"Europe Plots to Stop Trump From Taking Greenland"
Holy hell.
Worth repeating:
The "cultural knowledge" that these institutions have is greater than the sum of the knowledge of participating individuals.
When you lose this kind of knowledge, there is no shortcut for getting it back. You have to go through the same trials that taught the lessons before.
The "cultural knowledge" that these institutions have is greater than the sum of the knowledge of participating individuals.
When you lose this kind of knowledge, there is no shortcut for getting it back. You have to go through the same trials that taught the lessons before.
January 24, 2025 at 4:16 PM
Worth repeating:
The "cultural knowledge" that these institutions have is greater than the sum of the knowledge of participating individuals.
When you lose this kind of knowledge, there is no shortcut for getting it back. You have to go through the same trials that taught the lessons before.
The "cultural knowledge" that these institutions have is greater than the sum of the knowledge of participating individuals.
When you lose this kind of knowledge, there is no shortcut for getting it back. You have to go through the same trials that taught the lessons before.
You shouldn't eat cigarettes
January 22, 2025 at 7:09 PM
You shouldn't eat cigarettes
I find the email link especially bothersome too: DEIAtruth@opm.gov
Implying that if you write in claiming there is conspiracy, you are a champion of "truth". In reality, it just means you don't want equality.
Implying that if you write in claiming there is conspiracy, you are a champion of "truth". In reality, it just means you don't want equality.
January 22, 2025 at 5:45 PM
I find the email link especially bothersome too: DEIAtruth@opm.gov
Implying that if you write in claiming there is conspiracy, you are a champion of "truth". In reality, it just means you don't want equality.
Implying that if you write in claiming there is conspiracy, you are a champion of "truth". In reality, it just means you don't want equality.
Do some actual reporting.
January 20, 2025 at 1:01 AM
Do some actual reporting.
So, entities that are able to make over 250k A YEAR from just the capital they hold would run away to the States for that incremental 16% savings?
It would hurt them that much? Low productivity couldn't be helped by giving money back to people that is frozen in billionaire/corporate accounts?
It would hurt them that much? Low productivity couldn't be helped by giving money back to people that is frozen in billionaire/corporate accounts?
January 18, 2025 at 12:12 AM
So, entities that are able to make over 250k A YEAR from just the capital they hold would run away to the States for that incremental 16% savings?
It would hurt them that much? Low productivity couldn't be helped by giving money back to people that is frozen in billionaire/corporate accounts?
It would hurt them that much? Low productivity couldn't be helped by giving money back to people that is frozen in billionaire/corporate accounts?
Now this is hard hitting journalism. Thank you.
January 12, 2025 at 8:18 PM
Now this is hard hitting journalism. Thank you.
I am totally on board with more research. It is always better to have better data!
I guess the trigger for my comment was more of a distaste for the boogeyman that "chemicals" is. But I might be projecting my feelings onto your words.
Communicating science that doesn't hit people's biases is hard.
I guess the trigger for my comment was more of a distaste for the boogeyman that "chemicals" is. But I might be projecting my feelings onto your words.
Communicating science that doesn't hit people's biases is hard.
December 19, 2024 at 3:07 PM
I am totally on board with more research. It is always better to have better data!
I guess the trigger for my comment was more of a distaste for the boogeyman that "chemicals" is. But I might be projecting my feelings onto your words.
Communicating science that doesn't hit people's biases is hard.
I guess the trigger for my comment was more of a distaste for the boogeyman that "chemicals" is. But I might be projecting my feelings onto your words.
Communicating science that doesn't hit people's biases is hard.
While the idea of "forever chemicals on your wrist" does feel uncomfortable, is it actually any real cause for concern?
I may be missing something in this specific case, but it seems like there is an implicit communication of danger - that at this point is unfounded.
I may be missing something in this specific case, but it seems like there is an implicit communication of danger - that at this point is unfounded.
December 19, 2024 at 1:57 PM
While the idea of "forever chemicals on your wrist" does feel uncomfortable, is it actually any real cause for concern?
I may be missing something in this specific case, but it seems like there is an implicit communication of danger - that at this point is unfounded.
I may be missing something in this specific case, but it seems like there is an implicit communication of danger - that at this point is unfounded.
A long winded question:
EPA and NIH have recent studies around the chemical in question (PFHxA). EPA has no immediate concerns but wants more studies. NIH says there is enough evidence to say it is not carcinogenic, a selective reproductive or developmental toxicant, or an endocrine disruptor.
EPA and NIH have recent studies around the chemical in question (PFHxA). EPA has no immediate concerns but wants more studies. NIH says there is enough evidence to say it is not carcinogenic, a selective reproductive or developmental toxicant, or an endocrine disruptor.
December 19, 2024 at 1:57 PM
A long winded question:
EPA and NIH have recent studies around the chemical in question (PFHxA). EPA has no immediate concerns but wants more studies. NIH says there is enough evidence to say it is not carcinogenic, a selective reproductive or developmental toxicant, or an endocrine disruptor.
EPA and NIH have recent studies around the chemical in question (PFHxA). EPA has no immediate concerns but wants more studies. NIH says there is enough evidence to say it is not carcinogenic, a selective reproductive or developmental toxicant, or an endocrine disruptor.
Truly hard hitting journalism. So brave.
December 15, 2024 at 1:37 AM
Truly hard hitting journalism. So brave.
Is this dystopian...
Yeah, it's dystopian.
Yeah, it's dystopian.
December 3, 2024 at 5:04 PM
Is this dystopian...
Yeah, it's dystopian.
Yeah, it's dystopian.
The article was paywalled so I only read the freely available section, but the topic is well tackled in this video:
youtu.be/A3wJcF0t0bQ?...
Some parts of it feel extremely obvious. But I suppose things aren't always as they feel.
youtu.be/A3wJcF0t0bQ?...
Some parts of it feel extremely obvious. But I suppose things aren't always as they feel.
Why everyone stopped reading.
YouTube video by Jared Henderson
youtu.be
December 3, 2024 at 7:02 AM
The article was paywalled so I only read the freely available section, but the topic is well tackled in this video:
youtu.be/A3wJcF0t0bQ?...
Some parts of it feel extremely obvious. But I suppose things aren't always as they feel.
youtu.be/A3wJcF0t0bQ?...
Some parts of it feel extremely obvious. But I suppose things aren't always as they feel.