1) he has 175,000 followers and is thus a fairly large account with some degree of influence on here, so he’s not a rando like you and me
2) all of my posts here have been laser focused on factual contentions. Why is it unacceptable or rude to challenge factual premises of someone’s position?
February 14, 2025 at 5:09 PM
1) he has 175,000 followers and is thus a fairly large account with some degree of influence on here, so he’s not a rando like you and me
2) all of my posts here have been laser focused on factual contentions. Why is it unacceptable or rude to challenge factual premises of someone’s position?
That’s not correct. My comment to which WhisperingSage replied is about electing Democrats and primarying out bad ones. This is irrefutably a discussion of elections other than presidential elections, which of course is in line with everything else I’ve been saying here.
February 12, 2025 at 9:34 PM
That’s not correct. My comment to which WhisperingSage replied is about electing Democrats and primarying out bad ones. This is irrefutably a discussion of elections other than presidential elections, which of course is in line with everything else I’ve been saying here.
Our first interaction was you responding to me, and I had been writing expressly about the many State parties and the laws governing various State party primaries. You implicitly steered the conversation away from what I had expressly made the conversation about, in the very first instance.
February 12, 2025 at 9:22 PM
Our first interaction was you responding to me, and I had been writing expressly about the many State parties and the laws governing various State party primaries. You implicitly steered the conversation away from what I had expressly made the conversation about, in the very first instance.