Gido van de Ven
gmvandeven.bsky.social
Gido van de Ven
@gmvandeven.bsky.social
Researcher on continual learning, taking a deep learning as well as cognitive science perspective. At the University of Groningen, the Netherlands.
It has been claimed that for the performance it doesn’t really matter how the Fisher is computed. But while this holds to some extent for Split MNIST, already with Split CIFAR-10 significant differences in performance emerge.

At ICLR? Come and hear more at poster #483 on Saturday-morning!
April 25, 2025 at 5:13 PM
Try out the class-incremental learning with repetition benchmarks of the challenge yourself! github.com/ContinualAI/...
GitHub - ContinualAI/clvision-challenge-2023: Development kit for the CLVISION @ CVPR 2023 Challenge
Development kit for the CLVISION @ CVPR 2023 Challenge - ContinualAI/clvision-challenge-2023
github.com
December 2, 2024 at 1:02 PM
These winning strategies clearly outperform experience replay on data streams *with* repetition, but on a “standard” task-based continual learning stream *without* repetition, experience replay performs better.
December 2, 2024 at 1:02 PM
A striking outcome of the challenge was that all winning teams used some kind of ensemble-based approach, in which separate sub-networks per task/experience are learned and later combined for making predictions.
December 2, 2024 at 1:02 PM
Thanks Simon! I’d be keen to be added as well ☺️
November 13, 2024 at 8:11 PM