(((E. Glen Weyl/衛谷倫))) ⿻ 🇺🇸/🇩🇪/🇹🇼
@glenweyl.bsky.social
Papa of two girls; husband to Alisha Holland; Jew; Founder & Research Lead, Microsoft Research Plural Technology Collaborator; Founder & Chair, Plurality Institute; Founder & Board Member, RadicalxChange Foundation; co-author, Radical Markets and Plurality
Reposted by (((E. Glen Weyl/衛谷倫))) ⿻ 🇺🇸/🇩🇪/🇹🇼
I especially love Singapore's regular think tanks that inspire youth to reimagine governance. I once wrote about one of the ideas that resulted: A "wikiocracy." www.elysian.press/p/what-if-go...
What if government worked like Wikipedia?
Wikiocracy as the next phase of democracy.
www.elysian.press
September 9, 2025 at 8:20 PM
I especially love Singapore's regular think tanks that inspire youth to reimagine governance. I once wrote about one of the ideas that resulted: A "wikiocracy." www.elysian.press/p/what-if-go...
They also have done more with Georgism and land taxes which I love than anywhere in the world…and have the most robust and scientific DEI-type system on the planet as well as incredible public housing…hardly Curtis’s paradise
September 9, 2025 at 8:05 PM
They also have done more with Georgism and land taxes which I love than anywhere in the world…and have the most robust and scientific DEI-type system on the planet as well as incredible public housing…hardly Curtis’s paradise
Singapore has actually recently become an avid user of QV
September 9, 2025 at 8:04 PM
Singapore has actually recently become an avid user of QV
Reposted by (((E. Glen Weyl/衛谷倫))) ⿻ 🇺🇸/🇩🇪/🇹🇼
The solution isn't to abolish democracy, it's to innovate it. @glenweyl.bsky.social thinks democracy could become incredibly organized and efficient if we catch it up to the times with:
Quadratic voting
Quadratic budgeting
Participatory democracy
And yes, automation!
Quadratic voting
Quadratic budgeting
Participatory democracy
And yes, automation!
September 9, 2025 at 6:58 PM
The solution isn't to abolish democracy, it's to innovate it. @glenweyl.bsky.social thinks democracy could become incredibly organized and efficient if we catch it up to the times with:
Quadratic voting
Quadratic budgeting
Participatory democracy
And yes, automation!
Quadratic voting
Quadratic budgeting
Participatory democracy
And yes, automation!
What did you think @gregmepstein.bsky.social ?
September 5, 2025 at 2:51 AM
What did you think @gregmepstein.bsky.social ?
This Kentucky example is a long running one yes
August 11, 2025 at 10:48 AM
This Kentucky example is a long running one yes
The goal is to give an exit to as many people as possible who are on the moving walkway from normal tech bro to full on NRX
August 4, 2025 at 7:50 PM
The goal is to give an exit to as many people as possible who are on the moving walkway from normal tech bro to full on NRX
I am debating him next month. opentodebate.org/debate/shoul...
Should the U.S. Be Ruled by a CEO Dictator?
Live NYC Debate Thursday, September 4, 2025 | Venue: Racket NYC Doors open at 6:00 PM | Debate starts at 7:00 PM Buy Tickets HERE | Register for the livestream HERE What if the U.S. abandoned democrat...
opentodebate.org
August 3, 2025 at 7:45 PM
I am debating him next month. opentodebate.org/debate/shoul...
Reposted by (((E. Glen Weyl/衛谷倫))) ⿻ 🇺🇸/🇩🇪/🇹🇼
@glenweyl.bsky.social — Founder, Plural Technology at Microsoft and tech liberty initiatives.
July 17, 2025 at 9:02 PM
@glenweyl.bsky.social — Founder, Plural Technology at Microsoft and tech liberty initiatives.
And thereby helps to some extent justify, I think, the deep mistrust so many have towards economic and money-based solutions to political settings, and possibly points to how to think in a way consistent with mechanism design past these limitations.
July 15, 2025 at 1:48 PM
And thereby helps to some extent justify, I think, the deep mistrust so many have towards economic and money-based solutions to political settings, and possibly points to how to think in a way consistent with mechanism design past these limitations.
While this all may sounds ultra-econ-nerdy (it is!), it is really a deconstruction of the econ paradigm from within it, showing that the paradigm just cannot deal with a world of public goods/increasing returns in any meaningful sense.
July 15, 2025 at 1:48 PM
While this all may sounds ultra-econ-nerdy (it is!), it is really a deconstruction of the econ paradigm from within it, showing that the paradigm just cannot deal with a world of public goods/increasing returns in any meaningful sense.