Graeme Smyth
banner
gjsmyth.bsky.social
Graeme Smyth
@gjsmyth.bsky.social
Hi JJW. I was responding to the penguin account.
December 13, 2025 at 6:51 AM
This complaint is about platform implementation not gov policy.
The law does not tell platforms to create a poor user experience or to regulate corporate accounts - these are choices by platforms.
The law says "prevent under 16s from having accounts" & "protect users privacy and data".
December 13, 2025 at 6:37 AM
When you want to be annoyed about this new policy, remember who is causing the harm here - social media companies who prioritise engagement (money) over safety.
They knowingly and intentionally design their products in ways that cause harm.
Governments have a duty to protect citizens.
December 13, 2025 at 6:28 AM
Hi JJW. Yes, complex issue requiring multi-stakeholder action
p15 = proposed actions for policymakers who "play an imp't role...in protecting youth from harm [from social media]" incl "policies that limit access...to minimise harm...incl enforcing age minimums."
+ More action req'd by more parties.
December 13, 2025 at 6:23 AM
I prefer this one from Greta Thunberg “The one thing we need more than hope is action. Once we start to act, hope is everywhere.”
December 12, 2025 at 10:44 AM
"Hope is a creature of privilege: we know that things will be lost, but it is comforting to believe that others will bear the brunt of it...We need courage, not hope...Courage is the resolve to do well without the assurance of a happy ending."
@drkatemarvel.bsky.social
onbeing.org/blog/kate-ma...
We Need Courage, Not Hope, to Face Climate Change
Where do we go when we are beyond hope? A climate scientist reflects on the courage we need to accept that we must continue to pursue solutions, even in the face of failure.
onbeing.org
December 12, 2025 at 10:37 AM
Double-bendy buses in Brisbane!
December 12, 2025 at 4:15 AM
Also, this foundational premise is false.
Young people are not banned from seeking and finding information and help on the internet.
December 10, 2025 at 7:57 AM
Importantly, access doesn't include the auto-playing algorithnically-fed infinite-scrolling gamified-relationship endless-notification engine hacking their attention under the false premise of 'social relationships'.
That is the purpose.
Not to keep them off the internet.
December 10, 2025 at 7:52 AM
*not stupid
December 10, 2025 at 1:24 AM
Goodnight JJW.
I hope you take the time to read the report I sent you.
December 9, 2025 at 9:30 AM
What?
December 9, 2025 at 9:26 AM
I use my real name (which you refuse to spell correctly). There's no mystery.
December 9, 2025 at 9:09 AM
I would hope we can do better than "I don't like this idea because people I don't like are supporting it"
Recognise the real harms, vulnernable victims (esp kids), & the fundamental power asymmetry between kids+parents & the most powerful people/companies to ever exist.
That needs gov regulation.
December 9, 2025 at 9:05 AM
It's a good article & raises critical issues. Equity, access, community, privacy ✅
But it doesn't mention or acknowledge the very real harms associated with access by minors to social media & other inappropriate online content.
This is a good report & worth a read.
www.hhs.gov/surgeongener...
www.hhs.gov
December 9, 2025 at 7:39 AM
Thanks for your helpful contribution, Mike.
December 9, 2025 at 5:58 AM
Ongoing engagement with kids & good parenting! More of this! More of other initiatives from gov, society, etc.
SM delay is ALSO needed.
The technofeudalists have shown that child (or societal) health & safety is not priority.
Parents (alone & individually) *cannot* counter multi-$B brain hacking.
December 9, 2025 at 3:44 AM
"the entire ban is a mindless reaction to something which could be solved by parents talking to their kids"
This is a false/incomplete solution based on a false assumption.
December 9, 2025 at 3:16 AM
I genuinely wish you and little scribble face all the best. It is a tough future to grow up in (and to parent).
But suggesting that other people are bad parents because all the harms of social media would be avoided if only they were better (like you?) is just flat out incorrect.
December 9, 2025 at 3:11 AM
"This could be solved by parents talking to kids" is not a thing, JJW.
That comes across as arrogant and/or naive.
December 9, 2025 at 3:04 AM
Platforms are obliged to self assess against the legislation criteria and apply age verification accordingly.
The "list" are the major platforms that the most kids are on/identified as causing most harm to young people and who the government has informed are expected to comply.
December 9, 2025 at 3:01 AM
Funny.
My question is genuine. Do you have real concerns about these third party services? And if so, which ones and why?
I'm certainly no expert, but my perception is that Stripe have earned a reputation as a high trust provider of services to support online transactions.
December 9, 2025 at 2:49 AM
Ok. Sounds lonely.
December 9, 2025 at 2:36 AM
Do you not trust Stripe, Yoti or Veriff services?
December 9, 2025 at 2:32 AM